PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society0 citationsOpen Access

Photometric masses for long period CVs: the case study of CSS131106

View Full Paper
MDM DasSLS P LittlefairSPS G Parsons

Key Points

  • The study aims to determine the mass parameters of the cataclysmic variable CSS131106 using high-speed photometry.
  • Conducted high-speed photometry of the eclipsing cataclysmic variable CSS131106.
  • Utilized photometric eclipse method to model the eclipse lightcurve.
  • Determined the mass ratio from the timing of white dwarf and bright spot eclipses.
  • Performed simulations to constrain component masses.
  • Mass ratio of q = 0.81 ± 0.06 and inclination of i = 78.5 ± 0.7 degrees.
  • White dwarf mass Mw = 0.72 ± 0.04 M⊙ and donor mass Md = 0.58 ± 0.06 M⊙.
  • Estimated white dwarf temperature Teff = 18,500 ± 2,000 K.
  • Identified unusually small and cool donor sizes compared to typical M-dwarfs.

Abstract

Abstract We present high-speed photometry of the eclipsing cataclysmic variable CSS131106 J052412+004148. We determine the system parameters by modelling the eclipse lightcurve using the photometric eclipse method, in which the mass ratio is determined from the relative timings of the white dwarf and bright spot eclipses. Despite the blended white dwarf and bright spot ingress, typical of longer period cataclysmic variables, we perform simulations that show we are able to reliably constrain the component masses. We find a mass ratio of q = 0. 81 ± 0. 06 and inclination i = 78. 5 ± 0. 7 degrees. The white dwarf and donor masses were found to be Mw = 0. 72 ± 0. 04 M⊙ and Md = 0. 58 ± 0. 06 M⊙ respectively. The white dwarf temperature was estimated to be Teff = 18 500 ± 2 000 K, implying a moderate accretion rate of Ṁ = 3 1 10^-10 M⊙ yr−1. The donor in CSS131106 J052412+004148 joins two other long-period cataclysmic variables (IP Peg and HS 0220+0031) in being unusually small for its mass, even when compared to detached M-dwarfs. The donors in all three systems are also unusually cool for their mass. We discuss possible explanations for the small radii and cool temperatures of the donors in these systems, but find no viable explanation for their properties.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Das et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4ccaffdc3bde448918217https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stag549
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper