PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026Journal of Orofacial Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Remineralization Efficacy of Magnetic Nanoparticle Incorporated Nanohydroxyapatite and Its Combination with Calcium Phosphate Ion Clusters on Enamel

View Full Paper
RBRam Chowdary BasamNBNagesh BollaSVSayesh Vemuri

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the effectiveness of magnetic nanoparticle incorporated nanohydroxyapatite and its combination with calcium phosphate ion clusters on enamel remineralization.
  • Fifty extracted human mandibular molars were used for the study.
  • Samples underwent sectioning to create enamel windows and were divided into four treatment groups.
  • Analyses included XRD for structure, Vickers microhardness testing, HRTEM for morphology, SEM-EDX for surface composition, and AFM for surface roughness.
  • Significant improvements in enamel microhardness were found after applying the remineralizing agents.
  • Differences in the Ca:P ratio and surface roughness were observed among the groups.
  • HRTEM confirmed the crystallinity of the particles used.

Abstract

Introduction: The management of enamel caries lesions has undergone a paradigm shift, focusing on early detection and noninvasive approaches, driven by advancements in remineralizing agents. This study evaluates the effect of a magnetic field on enamel remineralization using magnetic nanoparticle incorporated nanohydroxyapatite (MNHAP) and its combination with calcium phosphate ion clusters (CPICs). Materials and Methods: Fifty extracted human mandibular molars were selected. After sectioning the samples with a diamond disc, 4 × 4 mm windows were created on the enamel surface. The samples were divided into four groups: Group A: control, Group B: NHAP, Group C: MNHAP, and Group D: CPIC + MNHAP. XRD analysis was performed to analyze the structure and phase of the particles for Group D. Vickers microhardness testing was conducted to evaluate enamel hardness. HRTEM was used to assess particle morphology, while SEM-EDX was employed to examine surface morphology and elemental composition. AFM was used to evaluate surface roughness across the different treatment groups. Results: Data were statistically analyzed using analysis of variance and pairwise comparisons with Tukey’s post hoc test. Within-group comparisons were done using the paired sample t -test. A statistically significant difference was observed in microhardness before and after demineralization and following the application of remineralizing agents in each group. Significant differences were also noted in the mean Ca:P ratio and surface roughness among the groups. HRTEM analysis confirmed the crystallinity of particles in each group. Conclusions: MNHAP, as well as its combination with CPICs, has shown enhanced remineralization in the presence of a magnetic field.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Basam et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4ccc9fdc3bde448918644https://doi.org/10.4103/jofs.jofs_74_25
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Demineralization–remineralization dynamics in teeth and bone2016 · 692 citations
  2. 2Potential agents to control enamel caries-like lesions2009 · 112 citations
  3. 3Accelerated synthesis of biomimetic nano hydroxyapatite using simulated body fluid2016 · 53 citations
  4. 4Techniques for the production of dental eroded lesions in vitro1999 · 73 citations
  5. 5The Chemistry of Enamel Caries2000 · 316 citations