PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026Critical Care Medicine0 citations

620: Costly Conferences: Analyzing Gaps in Affordability for Medical Students to Attend Conferences

View Full Paper
APAyal PierceADAlexander DullaHHHarrison Heitzig

Key Points

  • The study aims to analyze the affordability of medical conference attendance and assess available funding at U.S. medical schools.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional study of student registration fees for 26 core and 27 subspecialty conferences.
  • Reviewed websites of U.S. medical schools to identify funding for students.
  • Calculated Affordability Ratios (AF) to compare awards against median registration fees.
  • Presented data on registration costs and school funding across different specialties.
  • 52 out of 66 analyzed conferences had published registration fees, with median costs for core specialties at $273.
  • Only 58.3% of school-subspecialty pairs met an AF > 1.0, indicating significant cost coverage gaps.
  • A ten-fold variation in median school awards existed across states, from $150 to $1,500.
  • Subspecialty meetings had higher registration fees, averaging $570, with many offering limited funding.

Abstract

Introduction: Academic conferences offer medical students valuable opportunities for networking, specialty exploration, and strengthening applications. High cost of registration may pose financial barriers, disadvantaging students from lower-income backgrounds. This study examines the affordability of conference attendance across specialties and compares those to available funding at U. S. medical schools Methods: A cross-sectional study analyzing the publicly advertised student registration fees for 26 NRMP core specialty and 27 subspecialty conferences. In parallel, we reviewed US accredited Medical schools’ websites to identify funding available to students. For each school–specialty pair, we calculated an Affordability Ratio (AF) by dividing the school’s award by the median conference registration fee Results: Of the 66 NRMP core specialty/subspecialty society conferences, 52 had published registration fees. Of the 207 medical schools, 86 publicly listed their funding. The median baseline school award was US 500 and did not differ by public versus private or by degree type (DO vs MD). State-level medians varied ten-fold, from US 150 in Mississippi to US 1, 500 in New Mexico. For core specialties, the median non-member student registration fee was US 273 (IQR, US 104–594). When each school’s award was paired with the median fee for every specialty, 1, 616 of 2, 150 possible combinations (75. 1 %) achieved an AF ≥ 1. 0. Coverage exceeded 9% for Anesthesiology, Family Medicine, and Child Neurology but fell below 30% for Plastic Surgery, Pathology, Surgery, Neurology, and Radiology Subspecialty meetings were more expensive. The median fee across subspecialties was 570 (IQR 253–823). Only 58. 3% of school–subspecialty pairs met AF of >1. 0. Ten subspecialties exhibited coverage 800. In contrast, 11 subspecialties—largely pediatric with fees ≤ 150— were fully covered Conclusions: While three-quarters of U. S. medical schools’ standard travel awards cover registration for most specialty conferences, a gap persists risking inequitable access to career-shaping opportunities. Societies should be mindful of funding provided by schools and price their registration fees to allow more access

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pierce et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4ccd6fdc3bde448918768https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0001184476.74223.e2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper