PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026Religions0 citationsOpen Access

Performance in Action and Textual Re-Creation: A Study of the Dual Performativity in Hyakuzahōdan Kikigakishō (百座法談聞書抄)

View Full Paper
ZZZiqi ZhangKLK. J. Ray LiuYZYingbo Zhao

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore the dual performativity within the Hyakuzahōdan Kikigakishō, analyzing its roles as both a live ritual and a constructed text.
  • Utilizes the framework of dual performativity to analyze the Hyakuzahōdan Kikigakishō.
  • Applies theories of the archive and repertoire to examine textual construction and oral performance.
  • Integrates methodologies from textual history, rhetorical analysis, ritual theory, and intellectual history.
  • Demonstrates that the Hyakuzahōdan Kikigakishō is a constructed text with specific political aims.
  • Reveals the text's role in integrating religious and social identities through subordinate narrative techniques.
  • Highlights how the text serves as a mechanism for aristocratic self-affirmation and cohesion, reinforcing elite cultural identity.

Abstract

The Hyakuzahōdan Kikigakishō (百座法談聞書抄, hereafter Hyakuza 百座), compiled in the late Heian period, is an important Buddhist document that records a hundred-day lecture series on the Lotus Sutra (法華経). While previous scholarship has recognized the constructed nature of the text as a kikigaki (聞書), it has predominantly focused on content analysis, implicitly treating the text as a transparent window into the actual preaching event. To move beyond this limitation, this study proposes the analytical framework of dual performativity and, drawing on Diana Taylor’s theory of the archive and the repertoire, reexamines the text’s generative logic and political implications. This study argues that the Hyakuza embodies two interrelated forms of performance: first, the performativity of the hōdan (法談) as a live ritual, understood as a repertoire performance that constructs immediate authority through body, voice, and situational dynamics; second, the performativity of the kikigaki as textual construction, understood as an archival performance that transforms the ephemeral oral event into an authoritative, transmissible text through formulaic rhetoric, localized adaptation, and systematic arrangement. Integrating methodologies from textual history, rhetorical analysis, ritual theory, and intellectual history, this study demonstrates that the Hyakuza is not a neutral transcript of sermons but a meticulous, intentional act of writing with two fundamental aims: on a cultural level, to hierarchically integrate shinbutsu shūgō (神仏習合) through narrative appropriation; on a social level, to symbolically bind Buddhist merit with the institutional identities of aristocrats such as naishinnō (内親王), ultimately serving the self-affirmation internal cohesion, and cultural demarcation of the elite community from the masses, while simultaneously contributing to the state’s project of constructing a unified ideology in the late Heian period. By examining both cross-civilizational universal logic and specific historical context, this study reveals how the Hyakuza’s dual performativity produces and categorizes knowledge narratives while embedding political power dynamics, offering a critical path for the study of kikigaki-genre literature from discourse analysis to politics of textuality.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4cd05fdc3bde448918d8bhttps://doi.org/10.3390/rel17040410
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper