PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026Critical Care Medicine0 citations

312: Peripheral Intravenous Administration of Vasopressin: Is It Safe?

View Full Paper
FFF. Nishat FaruquiTETsz EngDKDon Kim

Key Points

  • This review assesses the safety of vasopressin given via peripheral venous catheters in critically ill patients.
  • Retrospective analysis using electronic medical records and adverse event reports.
  • Included adult patients in the medical intensive care unit receiving vasopressin via peripheral catheters.
  • Data collected on extravasation events, catheter days avoided, patient demographics, and ICU length of stay.
  • Only one patient (0.9%) experienced extravasation events while using peripheral catheters.
  • Total central venous catheter avoidance days were 62.
  • Median ICU length of stay was 6 days with 44% of patients discharged alive.

Abstract

Introduction: Vasopressors are traditionally administered via the central venous catheter (CVC) due to the concerns of extravasation and tissue injury. Catecholamine vasopressor administration via the peripheral venous catheter (PVC) has been shown safe. The PVC facilitates early vasopressor application and reduces the CVC complications such as infection, thrombosis, bleeding or pneumothorax. Data regarding the safety of vasopressin administration via the PVC is limited. Vasopressin has an intermediate to high vesicant risk due to low pH/ high osmolarity/vasoconstrictive properties and lacks specific antidote upon extravasation. This review assesses the safety of vasopressin administered via the PVC in critically ill patients and reduction in the CVC days. Methods: Retrospective analysis at an academic medical center via the electronic medical record and adverse event reporting system review. Inclusion- Adult patients under the medical intensive care unit (MICU) from 4/1/24 to 11/30/24 receiving vasopressin infusion via the PVC. Data collected include extravasation events, CVC days avoided, patient demographics, mortality/ ICU length of stay (LOS), PVC size/location & vasopressin dose/duration. Exclusion- Patients receiving vasopressin infusion via only the CVC. Results: A total of 101 (63%) patients were analyzed who received vasopressin via the PVC. One patient (0.9%) experienced extravasation (swelling/blistering) also had norepinephrine running through the same PVC. Total CVC avoidance days were 62. Median patient age was 57 years (males-58%). Primary diagnosis was shock with a median ICU LOS of 6 days. Mean vasopressin duration per patient was 14 hours (concentration 0.4 unit/ml & rate 0.03 unit/min) and 15 % of the patients received it peripherally for 24 hours or more. Maximal vasopressin peripheral infusion duration was 7 days. 16 % of the patients never required a CVC (44 % discharged alive & 25 % transferred to hospice). Most common PVC insertion site was forearm with 20 G or less. Conclusions: This study provides evidence for the safe administration of vasopressin via the PVC which is lacking in the published literature and shows considerable reduction in the CVC days. Future prospective randomized studies are needed to assess the true impact of the peripherally administered vasopressin.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Faruqui et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4cd3efdc3bde44891947fhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0001183244.78794.41
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper