PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy2 citationsOpen Access

Comparative in vitro activity of aztreonam–avibactam and aztreonam plus ceftazidime–avibactam against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex

View Full Paper
ACAshlan J. Kunz CoyneRGRachel GrayPGPavani Gonnabathula

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the in vitro effectiveness of aztreonam-avibactam and aztreonam-ceftazidime-avibactam against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
  • Twenty-three clinical S. maltophilia isolates underwent broth microdilution testing.
  • Gradient diffusion performed in parallel for aztreonam-avibactam and aztreonam-ceftazidime-avibactam.
  • Static 24-hour time-kill assays evaluated bactericidal activity.
  • Semi-mechanistic pharmacodynamic modeling was used to analyze growth kill dynamics.
  • Both regimens exhibited bactericidal activity against most isolates.
  • Aztreonam-ceftazidime-avibactam achieved greater reductions in specific isolates compared to aztreonam-avibactam.
  • Isolate-level variation was observed, with aztreonam-avibactam sustaining killing in some cases.

Abstract

Members of the Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex are intrinsically multidrug-resistant pathogens that disproportionately affect critically ill patients. Aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI), FDA approved in 2025, combines aztreonam (ATM; stable to L1 β-lactamase) with avibactam (AVI; an L2 β-lactamase inhibitor). Aztreonam plus ceftazidime-avibactam (ATM-CZA) has been used as a surrogate for ATM-AVI, but direct comparisons between the two regimens are lacking. Twenty-three clinical S. maltophilia complex isolates underwent broth microdilution (BMD) testing for ATM, ceftazidime, ATM-AVI, and ATM-CZA, with gradient diffusion performed in parallel for ATM-AVI and ATM-CZA. Static 24-h time-kill assays at humanized steady-state Cmax concentrations evaluated bactericidal activity (≥3-log₁₀ reduction). Semi-mechanistic pharmacodynamic modeling characterized growth kill dynamics by resistance determinants (blaL1, blaL2, smeABC). ATM-CZA and ATM-AVI MIC50/90 values for BMD were 1/2 and 2/4 mg/L, respectively. Both regimens were bactericidal against most isolates, with a mean paired difference of 0.09 log₁₀ colony-forming units (CFU)/mL (P = 0.83). Isolate-level variation was evident: ATM-AVI sustained killing, whereas ATM-CZA permitted regrowth for MD17639, -4.86 vs 0.13 log₁₀ CFU/mL, P = 0.019; MD17061, -2.61 vs 0.64 log₁₀ CFU/mL, P P = 0.026), MD17047 (-4.27 vs -2.64; P = 0.021), and UK4 (-3.47 vs -1.58; P = 0.017). Modeling predicted ATM-AVI benefit in blaL2 and ATM-CZA benefit against blaL1 or smeABC dominant isolates, and diminished activity of both when mechanisms coexisted. ATM-AVI and ATM-CZA show comparable in vitro activity against S. maltophilia complex. Isolate-level heterogeneity warrants further study of genotype-phenotype relationships.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Coyne et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4cdb6fdc3bde44891a6aehttps://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01456-25
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper