PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026Journal of Watershed Ecology0 citationsOpen Access

Comparing Drone and Satellite DEMs for Hydrodynamic Flood Modeling in a Rural Brazilian Catchment

RARibeiro Lutterback Dias AmandaKAKrishnamurti Bele駉 de Oliveira AntonioAJAraruna Junior Jos�Tavares

Key Points

  • The research aims to compare the effectiveness of drone-derived and satellite-based digital elevation models for flood risk assessment.
  • Developed hydrodynamic models using QGIS, HidroFlu, and MODCEL software.
  • Utilized two digital elevation models (one from NASA data and one from drone surveys).
  • Tested two boundary condition approaches based on precipitation and river discharge.
  • Conducted simulations at various spatial resolutions (10 m, 30 m, 50 m).
  • Drone-derived DEM at 10 m resolution provides the best representation of flood-prone areas.
  • Boundary conditions based on river discharge enhance model performance.
  • High-resolution DEMs increase operational costs due to more extensive fieldwork and computational needs.

Abstract

The rural region of the municipality of Bananal (SP, Brazil) experiences recurrent flooding events associated with rising water levels in tributaries of the Bananal River, especially during periods of intense rainfall. This study aimed to compare the performance of different Digital Elevation Models (DEMs), one derived from NASA orbital data and another generated from drone-based aerophotogrammetric surveys, in identifying and mapping flood-prone areas. The objective was to assess whether drone field campaigns are essential for this type of analysis or whether orbital DEMs are sufficient for the hydrodynamic characterization of the area. Hydrodynamic models were developed using the software QGIS, HidroFlu—for watershed parametrization and inflow estimation, and MODCEL—for hydrodynamic simulation, with spatial resolutions of 10 m, 30 m, and 50 m, in order to analyze the impact of topographic detail on simulation results. Two approaches were tested for defining boundary conditions: one based on precipitation data with a 25-year return period, and another based on the Bananal River discharge estimated from the watershed. The results indicated that the model based on the drone-derived DEM, with 10 m resolution and boundary conditions defined by river discharge, showed the best performance in representing floodable areas. However, the findings also highlight that high-resolution DEMs entail higher operational costs, due to the need for field activities and greater computational capacity to run the simulations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Amanda et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4cdcdfdc3bde44891a854https://doi.org/10.70322/jwe.2026.10004
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Human Impact of Floods: a Historical Review of Events 1980-2009 and Systematic Literature Review2013 · 621 citations
  2. 2Comparative analysis of HEC-HMS and SWAT hydrological models for simulating the streamflow in sub-humid tropical region in India2024 · 15 citations
  3. 3Global exposure to river and coastal flooding: Long term trends and changes2012 · 1,054 citations
  4. 4Urban Flood Simulation Using MODCEL—An Alternative Quasi-2D Conceptual Model2017 · 78 citations
  5. 5State-of-the-art hydrological models and application of the HEC-HMS model: a review2023 · 113 citations