PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026Critical Care Medicine0 citations

1686: Palliative Extubation: Institutional Practices and Needs Assessment

View Full Paper
EWErik WaySGShauna GibbonsAJAmanda Jobe

Key Points

  • The study aims to describe current practices and identify training needs for palliative extubation in an intensive care setting.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional survey of MICU staff, including physicians, APPs, RNs, and RTs.
  • Quantitative items assessed comfort level and clinical decision-making regarding palliative extubation.
  • Qualitative responses were thematically analyzed to identify key concerns and areas for improvement.
  • Participants reported high levels of comfort with palliative extubation (mean scores above 4/5).
  • Over 75% reported well-controlled patient symptoms during palliative extubation.
  • Many staff lacked formal training and regular protocol references, highlighting gaps in education and practice.

Abstract

Introduction: Palliative extubation (PE) describes removal of mechanical ventilation where death is expected and the goal is the patient comfort. As our institution does not implement formal training or protocols for PE, we sought to describe current PE practices in our medical intensive care units (MICU), improve end-of-life care, and identify opportunities to minimize psychological stress through structured surveys of staff members. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional survey of physicians, advanced practice providers (APPs), nurses (RNs), and respiratory therapists (RTs) at our institution. Quantitative items assessed experience, clinical decision-making, and institutional support. Qualitative responses were analyzed thematically and compared by role. Results: 55 physicians/APPs and 19 RNs/RTs participated. Over half reported >5 years ICU experience and most had participated in >10 PEs. This experienced cohort reported comfort during a PE (mean 4.31/5 physician/APP, 4.63/5 RN/RT) and well-controlled patient symptoms >75% of the time (collated 97.3%). Yet, RNs/RTs expressed difficulty in identifying patients at risk for uncontrolled symptoms after PE; physicians/APPs noted challenges in managing complex PEs, including terminal wean and airway collapse. Among our RN/RT group, many (94.7%) did not regularly reference a formal protocol or receive dedicated training (89.5%), nor did our physician/APP group (72.7% and 54.5% respectively). Use of standardized protocols (collated 75.5%) and subject-specific training (collated 58.5%) were highest scoring among suggested interventions. Thematic analysis identified key concerns: symptom burden (Physician/APP 58.5%, RN/RT 42.1%); family expectations (58.5%, 63.2%); communication needs (35.8%, 47.4%). RNs/RTs more often emphasized team dynamics and interdisciplinary planning, while physicians/APPs focused on medication management and symptom control. Conclusions: MICU staff identified breakdowns in communication, inadequate training in identifying and managing complex PEs, high symptom burden, and misalignment with families as contributors to nonoptimal management in PE. Across roles, there was clear need and strong support for institutional protocols and targeted educational initiatives to support patients and team members during PE and end-of-life care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Way et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4cdcdfdc3bde44891a904https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0001188740.87788.62
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper