PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 27, 2026Metals3 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of Wear Resistance of Lean Medium Mn AHSS After Q&P Heat Treatment

View Full Paper
JEJana EscherováMKMichal KrbaťaDKDaniel Križan

Key Points

  • The research aims to compare the wear resistance and hardness of lean medium manganese AHSS after various heat treatments.
  • Tested five heat treatment processes on AHSS samples.
  • Conducted tribological tests using the ball-on-flat method under dry conditions.
  • Evaluated friction behavior, wear resistance, and microstructural changes.
  • Measured nanoindentation hardness and surface roughness of samples.
  • The Mn-Q sample achieved the highest hardness at 483 HV5.
  • The Mn-Q&P 500 °C sample had the lowest hardness at 336 HV5, showing a 30% reduction due to tempering.
  • The Mn-HR 500 °C sample had the highest surface roughness at Sa = 1.876 μm.
  • The Mn-Q&P 500 °C sample exhibited the best wear resistance, 18% higher than Mn-HR 500 °C.
  • Identified wear mechanisms included abrasion and oxidation, affecting surface conditions.

Abstract

This study evaluates the tribological properties of lean medium manganese advanced high-strength steel (AHSS) subjected to five different heat treatment processes. The tests were conducted under dry reciprocating conditions using the ball-on-flat method, with a G40 steel ball, a 10 N load, and 1000 cycles at room temperature. Friction behavior, wear resistance, nanoindentation hardness, surface roughness, and microstructural changes were examined. The results showed that heat treatment significantly influenced the microstructure and hardness of the samples. The Mn-Q sample, with fresh martensite, achieved the highest hardness (483 HV5), while the Mn-Q&P 500 °C sample had the lowest (336 HV5), with a 30% reduction due to tempering. The Mn-HR 500 °C sample showed the highest surface roughness (Sa = 1.876 μm) due to microstructural heterogeneity. Despite similar coefficients of friction across all samples (0.55–0.57), the Mn-Q&P 500 °C sample exhibited the best wear resistance, 18% higher than the Mn-HR 500 °C variant. Wear mechanisms were identified as a combination of abrasion and oxidation, where the latter slightly reduced the coefficient of friction (COF) but increased surface degradation. These findings highlight the potential of lean medium Mn AHSS for tribological applications, offering a favorable balance of wear resistance and frictional stability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Escherová et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c61fa915a0a509bde1811ahttps://doi.org/10.3390/met16040362
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Influence of changes in alloying elements distribution and retained Austenite (RA) on mechanical properties of high boron alloy during quenching and partitioning(Q&P) process2022 · 9 citations
  2. 2Study of microstructure, mechanical properties and impact-abrasive wear behavior of medium-carbon steel treated by quenching and partitioning (Q&P) process2018 · 61 citations
  3. 3Influence of Quenching and Partitioning Parameters on Phase Transformations and Mechanical Properties of Medium Manganese Steel for Press-Hardening Application2021 · 24 citations
  4. 4Effect of Manganese on the Structure-Properties Relationship of Cold Rolled AHSS Treated by a Quenching and Partitioning Process2019 · 20 citations
  5. 5Thermal stability of retained austenite in TRIP steels studied by synchrotron X-ray diffraction during cooling2005 · 582 citations