PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 27, 2026Magic, ritual, and witchcraft0 citations

Money and Technology as Modern Magic

View Full Paper
AHAlf Hornborg

Key Points

  • The aim is to examine the relationship between modern technology and economic systems, revealing their deep social implications.
  • Analyzed the conceptual separation of technology and economy.
  • Compared ancient bronze metallurgy and eighteenth-century steam engines.
  • Explored concepts of fetishism in technology and economy.
  • Established that modern technologies are often misunderstood as separate from social relations.
  • Highlights the illusion of technological artifacts existing independently of market dynamics.
  • Shows that both ancient and modern technologies are influenced by long-distance exchange systems.

Abstract

Abstract: The modern distinction between technology and magic relies on the conceptual separation of technology and economy. However, as the efficacy of modern technology is contingent on the world market, and the alchemy of market exchange is a social convention indistinguishable from magic, technologies are ultimately societal strategies implicating subjective intentions, relations of power, and unequal exchange. This conclusion harmonizes with Bruno Latour's observation that humans use artifacts to create more extensive social systems but is also aligned with the Marxian notion of fetishism (from a Portuguese word for magic), which Latour has rejected. Beyond what Marx called money fetishism and commodity fetishism, modern people tend to be deluded by technological fetishism: the illusion that technological artifacts should be conceptually excised from the global social relations of exchange which make them possible, and which they reproduce. The article compares ancient bronze metallurgy with eighteenth-century steam engines as examples of how technologies tend to be understood as exhaustively accounted for by reference to esoteric knowledge systems, rather than acknowledging the systems of long-distance exchange on which they depend. In both cases, fetishized artifacts are ontologically excised from social relations. This is also the case with digital technologies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alf Hornborg (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c61fa915a0a509bde181b8https://doi.org/10.1353/mrw.2025.a985971
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper