Drought is a major limiting factor for apple growth and development. Abscisic acid (ABA) is a key hormone in plant abiotic stress responses, playing a vital role in mediating adaptation to drought. Malus sieversii, the wild ancestor of cultivated apple, exhibits superior drought tolerance. However, the specific ABA-dependent regulatory module underlying its exceptional drought tolerance remains to be elucidated. In this study, we investigated the role of ABA in the drought response of M. sieversii seedlings using a combination of exogenous ABA and the ABA biosynthesis inhibitor fluridone. Plants were subjected to four treatments: CK, PEG (20% PEG-6000), PEG+ABA (100 μM ABA) and PEG+FLU (100 μM fluridone). The results showed that ABA application significantly reduced the wilting rate by 45.53% and electrolyte leakage by 20.50% compared to the PEG treatment. Furthermore, it alleviated the decline in fresh weight and relative water content while reducing the accumulation of starch, sucrose, glucose, and fructose after seven days of stress. Conversely, FLU application intensified the adverse effects of drought. RNA-Seq analysis of the PEG+ABA vs. PEG comparison identified 5642 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), with significant enrichment in the starch and sucrose metabolism pathway, photosynthesis, carbon fixation, and MAPK signaling pathways. Exogenous ABA up-regulated BGLU23 while down-regulating BAM1. In contrast, no significant changes in their expression were observed under FLU treatment, suggesting their likely regulation in an ABA-dependent manner. In summary, ABA enhances osmotic-stress tolerance in M. sieversii through multiple pathways, among which starch and sucrose metabolism may represent a core and highly responsive regulatory pathway. Functional validation of key candidate genes BAM1 and BGLU23 remains an important direction for future investigation. These findings provide a theoretical basis for breeding drought-resistant apple rootstocks and for understanding ABA-mediated osmotic-stress tolerance mechanisms.
LIU et al. (2026) studied this question.