PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 27, 2026Polymers2 citationsOpen Access

Ammonium Bisulfite and Urea–Metabisulfite as Formaldehyde Scavengers in Low-Molar-Ratio Urea–Formaldehyde Resin for Medium-Density Fiberboard: Curing Behavior and Panel Performance

View Full Paper
VDViktoria DudevaGIGeorgi IvanovVSViktor Savov

Key Points

  • The research aims to evaluate ammonium bisulfite and urea–metabisulfite as formaldehyde scavengers in low-molar-ratio urea-formaldehyde resin used for MDF manufacturing.
  • Investigated the effect of 1, 3, and 5 wt% ammonium bisulfite and urea–metabisulfite on low-molar-ratio UF resin.
  • Conducted simultaneous thermal analysis to assess curing profiles.
  • Produced laboratory MDF panels and evaluated them for formaldehyde content and physical/mechanical properties.
  • Ammonium bisulfite increased curing peak temperatures, indicating stronger retardation of polycondensation.
  • Urea–metabisulfite created a broader, multi-peak curing profile.
  • Both additives significantly reduced formaldehyde content in MDF panels, achieving super E0 levels.
  • Additives did not significantly affect density, water absorption, or mechanical properties of the panels.

Abstract

Ultra-low-formaldehyde medium-density fiberboard (MDF) is commonly produced using low-molar-ratio urea-formaldehyde (UF) resins; however, the reduced formaldehyde-to-urea ratio also lowers resin reactivity and can complicate curing. The aim of this research work was to investigate and evaluate the performance of ammonium bisulfite and urea–metabisulfite as formaldehyde scavengers for a low-molar-ratio UF resin (F/U = 1.06) at 1, 3, and 5 wt% (based on dry UF resin solids) used for MDF panel manufacturing. The modified adhesive systems were first screened by simultaneous thermal analysis in air to determine changes in the curing profile, and laboratory panels were then produced and evaluated for formaldehyde content by the perforator method (EN ISO 12460-5:2015) and for the main physical and mechanical properties. Ammonium bisulfite shifted the main curing peak to higher temperatures, indicating stronger retardation of the principal polycondensation stage, whereas urea–metabisulfite generated a broader, multi-peak curing profile. Despite these differences, both additives reduced the perforator values substantially. The control MDF already met the E0 level (3.84 mg/100 g oven-dry board), while 3 wt% ammonium bisulfite and 5 wt% urea–metabisulfite reached the super E0 levels (<1.5 mg/100 g; 1.36 and 1.26 mg/100 g, respectively). To note, scavenger addition up to 5 wt% (based on dry UF resin solids) did not significantly affect density, water absorption/thickness swelling, or bending and internal bond properties. The results demonstrate that sulfite-based scavengers can be incorporated into low-molar-ratio UF adhesives to obtain ultra-low-formaldehyde MDF while maintaining the main panel properties.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dudeva et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c6206115a0a509bde18e2ahttps://doi.org/10.3390/polym18070786
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper