PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 27, 2026Current Oncology1 citationsOpen Access

“HER2-Low” and the Challenge of Repurposing Legacy HER2 IHC Biomarker Assays

View Full Paper
ETEmina TorlakovicAGA. Gown

Key Points

  • This research addresses the challenges of using legacy HER2 IHC assays for identifying HER2-low breast cancer.
  • Analysis of FDA approval expansion for Roche 4B5 monoclonal antibody IHC assay
  • Review of clinical trials (DESTINY-Breast04 and DESTINY-Breast06)
  • Evaluation of the analytical sensitivity and specificity for detecting 1+ HER2 cases
  • Comparison with other IHC assays like ALK, CD30, and PD-L1
  • Legacy HER2 IHC assay lacks established sensitivity and specificity for low HER2 identification
  • Reproducibility of pathology scoring at low HER2 levels is poor
  • Conventional IHC may miss cases that more sensitive methods could detect
  • ASCO/CAP guidelines may not be suitable for HER2-low detection without validation

Abstract

In September 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) expanded approval of the legacy Roche monoclonal antibody 4B5-based immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay to identify patients with HER2-low breast cancers predicted to respond to trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), based on findings from the DESTINY-Breast04 and DESTINY-Breast06 clinical trials. However, this repurposing of a legacy biomarker assay raises significant clinical and technical validation concerns. The legacy HER2 IHC assay was originally developed to identify tumors with HER2 overexpression (3+) resulting from gene amplification, which leads to substantially higher HER2 receptor expression than in low/ultralow expression tumors. The current application to distinguish HER2-low and HER2-ultralow tumors from truly HER2-negative tumors represents a fundamentally different biological and clinical purpose, yet the assay’s analytical and clinical validation for this new purpose remains incomplete. Critical gaps include the lack of established analytical sensitivity and specificity for identifying 1+ HER2 cases, poor reproducibility of pathologist scoring at low HER2 levels, and the absence of alternative methodologies for orthogonal validation. While more sensitive quantitative approaches (such as AQUA) may detect additional low HER2 expression cases missed by conventional IHC, increased analytical sensitivity does not automatically translate to clinical utility. Furthermore, the ASCO/CAP guidelines cutoffs were developed for HER2 overexpression detection and may not be the best choice for HER2-low/ultralow identification without clinical validation and determination of fit-for-purpose analytical specifications. We examine the current challenges of repurposing legacy HER2 IHC biomarker assays for HER2-low detection, evaluating the precedent of other repurposed IHC assays (ALK, CD30, and PD-L1), and emphasizing the necessity for proper technical and clinical validation before widespread implementation. We conclude that prospective clinical trials are essential to establish clinically meaningful cutoffs and analytical specifications appropriate for patient selection in HER2-low disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Torlakovic et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c620ab15a0a509bde192dehttps://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33040181
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper