PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 27, 2026AL-Qadisiya Journal For Law and Political Sciences0 citations

International Mechanisms for Restricting Impunity

View Full Paper
BABasil Ali Abbas

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore mechanisms for restricting impunity in high-severity crimes as outlined in the Rome Statute.
  • Analysis of legal frameworks established by international agreements
  • Examination of complementarity between national and international jurisdictions
  • Assessment of the principle of universal jurisdiction
  • Evaluation of legislative amendments required in domestic laws
  • Identified key principles necessary for reducing impunity
  • Highlighted the importance of binding international norms
  • Demonstrated the need for state parties to amend laws to criminalize serious violations

Abstract

The issue of studying impunity, particularly in high-severity crimes such as those mentioned in Article 5 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, through establishing legal frameworks and principles to prevent such violations, represents a crucial element in deterring international crimes and limiting their spread. Within the framework of international agreements, the international will has been directed towards enhancing the prosecution of perpetrators of serious violations and human rights abuses, as well as perpetrators of international crimes such as war crimes and crimes against humanity. The issue of addressing impunity, especially in serious crimes outlined in Article 5 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, is crucial in deterring international crimes and preventing their escalation. Establishing legal frameworks and principles is vital to hold perpetrators of human rights abuses and international crimes accountable. This requires state parties to make legislative amendments to criminalize these acts within their domestic laws, thereby preventing impunity. Emphasizing the obligation to prosecute criminals can lead to forming binding international norms, even against non-parties. This research analyzes the principles of complementarity between national and international jurisdictions and the principle of universal jurisdiction, which are essential in reducing impunity and achieving the international goal of accountability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Basil Ali Abbas (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c620d515a0a509bde197dfhttps://doi.org/10.63677/jqlap.2024.183597
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The International Criminal Court: current problems and ways of their solution2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2LJUBLJANA-THE HAGUE CONVENTION AS A FORMIDABLE FRAMEWORK IN FIGHTING IMPUNITY FOR INTERNATIONAL CRIMES: AN ASSESSMENT OF ADVANTAGES OF ACCESSION AND PERCEIVABLE CHALLENGES FOR STATES NOT PARTIES TO THE ROME STATUTE2025
  3. 3THE PRINCIPLE OF COMPLEMENTARITY BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL AND DOMESTIC JURISDICTIONS IN THE PROSECUTION OF WAR CRIMES2026
  4. 4ARTICLE 98 OF THE ROME STATUTE AS A SHIELD AGAINST THE PROSECUTION OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMES BY THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT2024
  5. 5Balancing the Legitimate Interests of States2024