PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 28, 2026Kidney International Reports0 citationsOpen Access

WCN26-3001 A Case of AA Amyloidosis derived from Adult-Onset Still's Disease successfully treated with Tocilizumab

SMShigematsu ManaWYWada YuseiTTTakano Tomoharu

Key Points

  • To compare clinical outcomes of patients with severe acute kidney injury managed with early renal replacement therapy versus conservative management.
  • Retrospective cohort study
  • Included 669 adult patients with KDIGO stage 3 acute kidney injury
  • Categorized patients into early RRT (within 24 hours) or conservative management
  • Analyzed in-hospital mortality, renal recovery, and dialysis dependence using logistic regression
  • Early RRT initiated in 16% of patients
  • No significant differences in in-hospital mortality (16% vs. 24%)
  • No significant differences in renal recovery (21% vs. 30%)
  • No significant differences in dialysis dependence (29% vs. 30%)

Abstract

Introduction: Background: Severe acute kidney injury (AKI) poses a significant clinical and economic burden, especially in resource-limited settings.The optimal timing for initiating renal replacement therapy (RRT) remains uncertain.Aim: To compare the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with severe AKI managed with early RRT versus conservative management at a tertiary hospital in the Philippines.Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 669 adult patients with KDIGO stage 3 AKI from 2021-2025.Patients were categorized into early RRT (initiated within 24 hours of diagnosis) or conservative management (medical treatment with or without delayed RRT).Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, renal recovery, and dialysis dependence.Logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders.Results: Early RRT was initiated in 16% of patients.There were no statistically significant differences in in-hospital mortality (16% vs. 24%; p = 0.063), renal recovery (21% vs. 30%; p = 0.107), or dialysis dependence (29% vs. 30%; p = 0.879) between early and conservative management groups.Conclusion: Early initiation of RRT did not confer significant clinical benefits over conservative management in severe AKI.In resourceconstrained settings, a symptom-guided, individualized approach may help reduce unnecessary RRT without compromising outcomes.I have no potential conflict of interest to disclose.I used generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process.During the preparation of this work the authors used ChatGPT in order to ask if some sentences can be improved to make some paragraphs more cohesive and concise.After using this tool/service, the authors reviewed and

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mana et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c770418bbfbc51511e0741https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2026.105665
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparison between Watchful Waiting Strategy and Early Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in The Critically Ill Acute Kidney Injury2024
  2. 2WCN26-1934 Efficacy and safety of telitacicept in treatment of Advanced IgA nephropathy2026
  3. 3WCN26-6545 ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY (AKI) CAUSED BY RHABDOMYOLYSIS SUCCESSFULLY TREATED WITH HEMODIALYSIS (HD) or HEMODIAFILTRATION (HDF): CASE SERIES2026
  4. 4WCN26-7160 Factors Associated with Early Kidney Recovery After KDIGO Stage 3 Acute Kidney Injury Requiring Renal Replacement Therapy: The RENRECOV Study2026
  5. 5Early versus Delayed Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials2025