PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 28, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

Individual and cumulative effects of social determinants of health on cardiovascular disease: Gender-specific insights from a cross-sectional NHANES study

View Full Paper
XYXiuming YangJZJiahui ZhouFWFeier Wu

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore how both individual and combined social factors affect cardiovascular disease rates, with a focus on gender differences.
  • Analyzed NHANES data from 2005–2018
  • Used logistic regression to assess associations with CVD prevalence
  • Conducted sex-stratified analyses
  • Utilized five core SDoH domains with eight sub-indicators
  • Increased cumulative adverse SDoH linked to higher odds of cardiovascular disease
  • Unemployment had a significant association with CVD (AOR = 2.27)
  • Some SDoH effects were stronger in women compared to men, though not statistically significant

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to examine the associations of individual and cumulative social determinants of health (SDoH) with cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevalence and sex-specific disparities among U.S. adults. Methods Employing a cross-sectional design, we analyzed data from the nationally representative National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2005–2018). Five core SDoH domains were operationalized through eight validated sub-indicators. Associations between individual and cumulative SDoH and CVD prevalence were assessed using survey-weighted multivariate logistic regression, with sex-stratified analyses. Results In this cross-sectional sample of 35,781 participants, adverse individual SDoH and higher cumulative adverse SDoH were associated with higher odds of prevalent CVD. In the fully adjusted model (Model 2), unemployment showed a large association with prevalent CVD (AOR = 2.27, 95% CI: 2.01–2.57). In sex-stratified analyses, point estimates for some SDoH indicators were higher in women than in men, but 95% confidence intervals overlapped for many comparisons and sex-by-SDoH interaction tests were not statistically significant (all P for interaction > 0.05). Among individual SDoH indicators, unemployment and low income (PIR < 300%), as well as food insecurity, showed the strongest independent associations with prevalent CVD. Conclusion Both individual and cumulative SDoH were independently associated with prevalent CVD. Sex-stratified analyses suggested that some point estimates were larger in women than in men, but sex-by-SDoH interaction tests were not statistically significant.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c770f78bbfbc51511e0d68https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344108
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper