PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 28, 2026Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica0 citationsOpen Access

Transcultural validation and factorial invariance assessment of the EEA Resilience Scale in health sciences students from eight Latin American countries

JGJosé Gamarra-MoncayoEMEstela Marcelo-AscencioLVLindsey W. Vilca

Key Points

  • The aim was to validate the EEA Resilience Scale across different cultures and assess its reliability among health sciences students.
  • Instrumental cross-sectional design with 18,528 health sciences students
  • Assessed internal structure using confirmatory factor analysis
  • Estimated reliability with the omega coefficient
  • Examined factorial invariance by sex and country
  • Established percentile norms
  • EEA Resilience Scale showed adequate fit indices in all countries
  • Satisfactory reliability except in El Salvador
  • Confirmed strict invariance by sex and country
  • Trivial effect sizes for country and sex differences
  • Proposed percentile-based norms at five levels

Abstract

Resilience is understood as a person’s ability to adapt positively in the face of adversity, overcome difficult situations, and, in many cases, emerge stronger from them. The objective of this study was to conduct a transcultural validation of the Engineering, Ecological and Adaptive Resilience Scale in health sciences students from eight Latin American countries. A total of 18,528 students participated in instrumental cross-sectional design. Internal structure was assessed through confirmatory factor analysis, reliability was estimated using the omega coefficient, factorial invariance by sex and country was examined, sex differences were analyzed, and percentile norms were established. The three-dimensional structure of the EEA Resilience Scale showed adequate fit indices in all countries and in the total sample, although Ecuador, Panama, and Peru exhibited Root Mean Square Error of Approximation values slightly above expected thresholds. Reliability was satisfactory, except in El Salvador. Strict invariance by sex and country was confirmed. Country and sex differences showed trivial effect sizes. Percentile-based norms were proposed at five levels. Overall, the findings indicate that the EEA Resilience Scale is a valid, reliable, and transculturally robust measure for assessing resilience. The scope of the study is discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gamarra-Moncayo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c771348bbfbc51511e122fhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-026-00387-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The mediating role of self-efficacy in the relationship between past professional training and burnout resilience in medical education: a multicentre cross-sectional study2024 · 11 citations
  2. 2The impact of the Systematic Assessment for Resilience (SAR) framework on students’ resilience, anxiety, depression, burnout, and academic-related stress: a quasi-experimental study2024 · 25 citations
  3. 3A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling2022 · 820 citations
  4. 4Building resilience among undergraduate health professions students: identifying influencing factors2024 · 35 citations
  5. 5What do we know about student resilience in health professional education? A scoping review of the literature2017 · 172 citations