PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 28, 2026Journal of Genetic Counseling0 citationsOpen Access

Cancer genetic testing uptake in the primary care setting: Patient perspectives on barriers and facilitators throughout the testing process

View Full Paper
TTTesla N. TheorynFBFaith BeersEDEmerson J. Dusic

Key Points

  • This research aims to identify patient-level barriers and facilitators affecting genetic testing uptake in primary care settings.
  • Conducted semi-structured interviews with 31 patients from the EDGE study.
  • Categorized patients based on testing status: non-completion, ineligibility, decline, or completion.
  • Performed thematic analysis to extract key barriers and facilitators from patient perspectives.
  • Patients broadly expressed interest in genetic testing, but faced barriers like limited technology access.
  • Concerns about privacy and insurance discrimination led many to decline testing.
  • Those completing testing were motivated by family cancer history and potential for preventive options.

Abstract

Genetic testing for gene variants associated with hereditary cancers can help with cancer prevention, early detection, and treatment. However, testing has not been well integrated into primary care settings where its preventative impact can be realized. To explore patient-level barriers and facilitators throughout the genetic testing process in primary care settings, we conducted a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with 31 patients within the Early Detection of Genetic Risk (EDGE) study who had not completed the risk assessment (n = 2), had completed the risk assessment but were ineligible (n = 8), had declined testing (n = 10), and had completed testing (n = 11). Interviewees were broadly interested in genetic testing. Those who did not complete the risk assessment cited limited access to technology, exacerbated by health and financial struggles. Several interviewees who completed the risk assessment but were deemed ineligible for testing indicated that their lack of knowledge about biological relatives prevented complete responses to the risk assessment. Those who opted out of testing cited concerns over privacy, insurance discrimination, and potential psychological burden. Notably, the majority who declined testing were unsure if they would refuse again in the future, and three went on to request genetic testing after being invited to complete an interview. Those who changed their minds about testing stated changes in life circumstances (such as obtaining life insurance) that facilitated openness to testing. Patients who completed testing shared similar concerns to those who declined but were motivated by their familial cancer history and believed genetic testing could lead to preventative options. A key finding of this study was that patient readiness for testing changed over relatively brief follow-up times. These results highlight the need for practicable approaches to re-offering genetic testing to individuals over time.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Theoryn et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c771688bbfbc51511e149fhttps://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.70195
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper