PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 28, 2026Journal of International Development0 citationsOpen Access

Inequalities in Safe Water, Improved Sanitation and Hand Hygiene Among Poverty‐Vulnerable Households: Evidence From Sub‐Saharan Africa

View Full Paper
RKRaymond Elikplim KofintiDMDamiano Kulundu MandaMOMartine Odhiambo Oleche

Key Points

  • The study aims to analyze economic inequalities in access to WASH services among poverty-vulnerable households in sub-Saharan Africa.
  • Analyzed harmonised Demographic and Health Survey data from 33 countries
  • Used a vulnerability-to-multidimensional-poverty framework
  • Employed concentration indices and decomposition techniques to assess WASH access inequality
  • Access to WASH services is disproportionately higher among less vulnerable households
  • Identified significant disparities in WASH access, particularly in urban areas
  • Vulnerability to multidimensional poverty is the main factor driving WASH inequality across all metrics

Abstract

ABSTRACT Access to safe drinking water, improved sanitation and hand hygiene (WASH) is fundamental to human health and sustainable development, yet large segments of the population in sub‐Saharan Africa continue to lack adequate access to these essential services. Moreover, even households already with access face the risk of water shortages due to climate change and related factors. Existing evidence on WASH inequality has largely focused on observed poverty and income‐based disparities, overlooking households that are vulnerable to future deprivations. This study contributes to the literature by examining economic inequalities in WASH uptake among poverty‐vulnerable households in sub‐Saharan Africa using harmonised Demographic and Health Survey data from 33 countries. We adopt a vulnerability‐to‐multidimensional‐poverty framework and employ a three‐stage feasible generalised approach to estimate vulnerability and identify households at risk of poverty. We employ concentration indices and decomposition techniques to quantify and explain inequality in WASH access among these households. Our results show that access to WASH is disproportionately concentrated among less vulnerable households, with inequalities being pronounced in urban areas but varying across sub‐regions. Vulnerability to multidimensional poverty emerges as the dominant driver of WASH inequality, accounting for a substantial share of observed disparities across all indicators. These findings underscore the importance of designing vulnerability‐sensitive and spatially differentiated policies to achieve equitable and sustainable progress toward universal access to WASH services.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kofinti et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c771838bbfbc51511e17f7https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.70077
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper