PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 28, 2026ICES Journal of Marine Science0 citationsOpen Access

Significance of rare species in evaluating marine conservation effects on fish community using hill numbers

View Full Paper
RZRongjie ZhaoBKBin KangYYYip Hung Yeung

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the role of rare species in marine conservation effects using eDNA and Hill numbers.
  • Calculated Hill numbers from eDNA data to evaluate fish diversity in marine protected areas (MPAs)
  • Included traditional survey data and various bioinformatic clustering pipelines
  • Analyzed the impact of different methods on ecological interpretation
  • Examined correlations between MPAs' protection time and diversity indices
  • eDNA detected significantly more fish species compared to traditional survey methods
  • Found that excluding rare species diminished inter-group differences, affecting ecological interpretations
  • Protection time of MPAs showed positive correlations with diversity indices, though not statistically significant

Abstract

Abstract Marine protected areas (MPAs) have been established worldwide to protect biodiversity and enhance ecosystem services. Rare species play vital roles in marine conservation as they exhibit unique ecosystem functions and are vulnerable to extinction. However, determining their importance to conservation effects remains challenging due to the lack of feasible and standardized evaluation methods. The noninvasive environmental DNA (eDNA) method is increasingly used in marine biomonitoring because of its efficiency and sensitivity. Hill numbers provide a uniform evaluation scheme for assessing biodiversity. In this study, we calculated Hill numbers from eDNA data to determine marine fish diversity in MPAs. Traditional survey data and different bioinformatic clustering pipelines were also included to decide the impact of survey and analysis methods on ecological interpretation. The results showed that eDNA detected significantly more species than contemporaneous traditional survey data. We further found less significant inter-group differences for different seasons and pipelines when rare species diminished, indicating that excluding rare species in evaluations could affect the ecological interpretation of marine conservation effects. Protection time of MPAs demonstrated positive correlations with all diversity indices, albeit not statistically significant. In conclusion, we demonstrated the importance of rare species in marine biodiversity assessment and recommend appropriate usage of eDNA and downstream diversity indices to achieve a comprehensive evaluation of the marine conservation effect of MPAs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c772158bbfbc51511e2529https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsag035
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1<scp>eDNA</scp> Metabarcoding as a Promising Conservation Tool to Monitor Fish Diversity in Indonesia Marine Protected Areas2026 · 2 citations
  2. 2Comparative Analysis Of Biodiversity Conservation Outcomes In Mpas Versus Non-Protected Marine Areas2025
  3. 3Assessing Marine Biodiversity and Conservation Strategies Using Molecular Ecology Tools in Coastal Ecosystems2025
  4. 4<scp>eDNA</scp> signals improve local predictions of fish abundances in Mediterranean coastal ecosystems2026
  5. 5Exploring reserve and depth refuge effects on marine fish communities: Insights from environmental <scp>DNA</scp> metabarcoding2025