PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 28, 2026Reports — Medical Cases Images and Videos0 citationsOpen Access

Urachal Carcinoma with Divergent Glandular Enteric-Type and Squamous Differentiation Associated with Bladder Exstrophy: Case Report of an Extremely Rare Entity

View Full Paper
CSCatalin-Bogdan SatalaGPGabriela PatrichiAGAlina-Mihaela Gurau

Key Points

  • This report aims to present a rare case of urachal carcinoma with mixed differentiation and its clinical implications.
  • Described the clinical presentation of a 52-year-old male with bladder exstrophy.
  • Performed radiologic evaluation to identify the mass along the urachal tract.
  • Conducted surgical excision and histological examination of the tumor.
  • Utilized immunohistochemical profiling to determine tumor origin.
  • The patient presented with a suprapubic mass and intermittent hematuria.
  • Histological analysis revealed two distinct tumor components: enteric-type adenocarcinoma and squamous carcinoma.
  • Immunohistochemical profiling confirmed the urachal origin of the carcinoma.

Abstract

Background and Clinical Significance: Urachal carcinoma (UrC) is an uncommon neoplasm derived from residual embryonic structures connecting the bladder to the umbilicus. Owing to its rarity, deep anatomic location, and histologic overlap with other glandular malignancies, accurate diagnosis remains challenging. Congenital anomalies of the lower urinary tract, including bladder exstrophy, are recognized as conditions that may predispose to malignant transformation of urachal remnants, although documented cases remain scarce. Case presentation: We describe the case of a 52-year-old male with bladder exstrophy and intellectual disability who presented with a progressively enlarging suprapubic mass and intermittent hematuria. Radiologic evaluation demonstrated a mass arising along the urachal tract. Surgical excision revealed a tumor composed of two morphologically distinct components: an enteric-type adenocarcinoma and a squamous carcinoma. Immunohistochemical profiling indicated urachal derivation and excluded other primary sites. Conclusions: This case expands the morphologic spectrum of UrC and emphasizes the diagnostic value of integrating clinical risk factors with detailed histologic and immunophenotypic assessment, particularly in tumors with mixed differentiation patterns.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Satala et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c7722a8bbfbc51511e27behttps://doi.org/10.3390/reports9020100
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The RB and p53 pathways in cancer2002 · 1,679 citations
  2. 2Classic bladder exstrophy and adenocarcinoma of the bladder: Methylome analysis provide no evidence for underlying disease-mechanisms of this association2019 · 12 citations
  3. 3Urachal carcinoma: a pathologic and clinical study of 46 cases2015 · 108 citations
  4. 4Clinical outcomes and patterns of population‐based management of urachal carcinoma of the bladder: An analysis of the National Cancer Database2022 · 12 citations
  5. 5Urachal carcinoma: Impact of recurrence pattern and lymphadenectomy on long‐term outcomes2020 · 27 citations