PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 28, 2026Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies0 citationsOpen Access

“Today a Follower, Tomorrow a Leader?”: Reserve Platoon Leaders’ Perceptions of Leader Competencies in the Process of Role Acquisition

ÜSÜlle SäälikAKAntek KasemaaTTTiia-Triin Truusa

Key Points

  • The study investigates reserve platoon leaders' perceptions of military leadership roles during training.
  • Qualitative self-analysis from participants before and after a five-week training course
  • Focus on perceived leadership competencies
  • Analysis of the evolution of personal and organizational values
  • Participants prioritized interpersonal and management competencies before training.
  • Post-training, there was a significant increase in the importance of intrapersonal competencies.
  • Discussed internal dilemmas regarding military versus civilian perceptions and values.

Abstract

Military leaders’ perception of their role affects both their own performance and the commitment and satisfaction of their subordinates. Leaders also play a significant role in nurturing ties between individual and organization, contributing to the collective will to invest in organizational goals. The ramifications of these leadership principles are particularly relevant in armies employing conscription and reserve-based defence models, where wartime leaders are typically reservists – civilians trained during their conscript period. This study focuses on Estonian reserve platoon leaders’ (RPL) perception of the military leader’s role, expressed through self-analyses written before and after a five-week training course. The results reveal the relative importance of interpersonal and management competencies in pre-course perceptions, followed by a sharp rise in the importance of intrapersonal competencies by the end of the course. Participants discussed self-related issues such as the tension between self-confidence and insecurity, emotional self-regulation, and behavioural reactions. While these refer to typical role acquisition issues, the participants emphasized specific internal dilemmas stemming from the discrepancy between military and civilian perceptions and the resulting tensions between personal and organizational values.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Säälik et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c772938bbfbc51511e31d7https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.312
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1We (All) Want You? Perceived Military Leadership Potential and Actual Leadership Role Occupancy in Working Life: A Longitudinal Study of a Swedish Cohort2024
  2. 2Responsible leadership in a military organization (in the light of opinion surveys of professional soldiers)2024
  3. 3All hail the warrior: How reinforcement sensitivity theory and leadership training explain naïve perceptions of military leadership2025
  4. 4Leadership and personality characteristics in the armed forces: a comparison of three levels of managerial experience2026
  5. 5Perceptions of U.S. military leadership: are all leaders created equally?2005 · 8 citations