PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 28, 2026Iconic Research and Engineering Journals0 citations

Bidirectional LSTM for Spam Detection and Sentimental Analysis

SGSadineni GopichandSSSontineni Jaswanth Siva SaiSAShaik Khaja Afrid Ali

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop and evaluate a Bidirectional LSTM model for spam detection and sentiment analysis in SMS and email communications.
  • Developed a Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) deep learning model.
  • Preprocessing included stemming, tokenization, and stop-word removal.
  • Utilized Word2Vec for feature extraction and sentiment analysis with AFINN and SentiWordNet lexicons.
  • Compared performance against a Hybrid K-Nearest Neighbors and Support Vector Machine classifier.
  • BiLSTM achieved an accuracy of 98.77% on the SpamAssassin dataset and 99.11% on the Email dataset.
  • Outperformed the hybrid KNN-SVM model significantly in accuracy, recall, F1-score, Kappa statistics, MAE, and RMSE across all datasets.

Abstract

Short Message Service (SMS) and email communication have become primary vectors for spam, placing heavy burdens on users and mobile network operators. This paper proposes a Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) deep learning model for spam detection and sentiment analysis, evaluated on three benchmark datasets: SpamAssassin, SMS, and Email. The model is compared against a Hybrid K-Nearest Neighbors and Support Vector Machine (Hybrid KNN-SVM) classifier from the prior literature. Preprocessing involves stemming, tokenization, and stop-word removal, followed by Word2Vec-based feature extraction. The BiLSTM network captures both past and future contextual information in text sequences, substantially outperforming the hybrid baseline. On the SpamAssassin dataset, BiLSTM achieves an accuracy of 98.77%, and on the Email dataset it reaches 99.11%. Sentiment polarity is classified using AFINN and SentiWordNet lexicons. Experimental results confirm that the proposed BiLSTM model yields superior accuracy, recall, F1-score, Kappa statistics, MAE, and RMSE across all three datasets.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gopichand et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c772938bbfbc51511e3280https://doi.org/10.64388/irev9i9-1715458
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Improved Spam Detection Through LSTM- Based Approach2024 · 6 citations
  2. 2SMS Spam Detection using NLP and Deep Learning Recurrent Neural Network Variants2024 · 9 citations
  3. 3Deep Learning-based Binary Classification for Spam Detection in SMS Data: Addressing Imbalanced Data with Sampling Techniques2023 · 4 citations
  4. 4Future SMS spam filtering: comparative fine-tuning of machine learning and LLMs2026
  5. 5Explainable and Efficient SMS Spam Detection Using Lightweight Attention-Based Sequential Models2026