PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Science and Engineering Ethics0 citationsOpen Access

Effects of a Novel Responsible Conduct of Research Training Program and Learning Transfer Intervention on Ethical and Professional Decision-Making Skills

TMTristan McIntoshESErin D. SolomonMDMihi Dormeville

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate the long-term effectiveness of RCR training and interventions on professional decision-making skills.
  • Conducted a three-part study involving biology and biomedical doctoral students.
  • Implemented baseline control training and revised culturally inclusive training across three cohorts.
  • Assigned students to control or intervention groups for learning transfer over five months after training.
  • Conducted follow-up interviews to gather qualitative insights about the learning transfer experience.
  • Participants receiving revised training scored higher in decision-making skills compared to baseline.
  • The learning transfer intervention did not significantly improve self-reported decision-making skill use.
  • Participants with lower pre-course scores exhibited sustained skill gains six months post-training.
  • Most interviewed participants viewed the learning transfer intervention as beneficial for reflection and intention.

Abstract

Little is known about the long-term effectiveness of responsible conduct of research (RCR) training and factors that support transfer of this learning to real-world settings after formal training concludes. We conducted a three-part study to explore short- and long-term effects of a culturally inclusive RCR training and a novel learning transfer intervention on professional decision-making skills. Biology and biomedical doctoral students across three cohorts participated in an RCR course focused on developing professional decision-making skills. In Study 1, students from Cohort 1 (N = 109) received the baseline control training, and students from Cohorts 2 and 3 (N = 195) received a revised culturally inclusive training. In Study 2, students from Cohorts 2 and 3 were randomly assigned to either a control group or a group receiving a monthly learning transfer intervention for 5 months after RCR training. The learning transfer intervention included identifying recent professional challenges, actions taken in response to challenges, and intentions to use professional decision-making strategies in the future. Study 3 involved follow-up interviews (N = 11) about experiences with the learning transfer intervention. Participants who received the revised training scored higher on professional decision-making compared to the baseline training. The learning transfer intervention did not improve self-reported use of professional decision-making skills. However, participants with low pre-course scores on professional decision-making saw sustained gains in these skills 6 months after the RCR training. Most participants interviewed about the learning transfer intervention perceived it as beneficial for being more reflective and intentional about using professional decision-making strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McIntosh et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c15ade0f0f753b39bd9fhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-026-00590-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper