PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Arthroplasty0 citationsOpen Access

Abstracts from the 11th Annual Meeting of Arthroplasty Society In Asia (ASIA), the 4th Annual Meeting of the Malaysian Society for Hip and Knee Surgeons (MSHKS), and the 17th Annual Meeting of the ASEAN Arthroplasty Association (AAA)

Key Points

  • Evaluate the efficacy of parallel osteotomy combined with a prosthetic spacer for Stage IV septic arthritis of the knee.
  • Conducted a prospective analysis of 23 patients with knee septic arthritis.
  • Patients underwent parallel osteotomy categorized into prosthetic and bone cement groups.
  • Measured operative time, blood loss, VAS scores, KSS scores, ROM, infection rates, and secondary surgery rates.
  • Utilized SPSS 21.0 for data analysis, with significance set at P < 0.05.
  • The prosthetic group showed significant improvements in operative time, blood loss, postoperative pain, KSS scores, and ROM compared to the cement group (P < 0.05).
  • Both groups had comparable infection control rates (P > 0.05).
  • The prosthetic group had a lower rate of secondary surgery compared to the bone cement group (P < 0.05).

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of the parallel osteotomy combined with a "prosthetic spacer" in the treatment of Stage IV septic arthritis (SA) of the knee, and to provide a staged treatment strategy that effectively controls infection while maximizing joint function preservation.Methods A prospective analysis was conducted on 23 patients diagnosed with knee SA at the joint department of Xi'an Honghui Hospital from 2020.9 to 2023.9.All patients underwent parallel osteotomy with a "joint spacer", categorized into a prosthetic group (12 cases, using CR femoral condyles and tibial polyethylene liners) and a bone cement group (11 cases, using cement-molded spacers).operative time, blood loss, preoperative/postoperative pain VAS scores, postoperative KSS scores, range of motion (ROM), 1-year infection recurrence rates, and secondary surgery rate were recorded.Data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0 (P 0.05), and the prosthetic group had a lower rate of secondary surgery (P < 0.05). ConclusionThe parallel osteotomy combined with a "prosthetic spacer" is a viable option for severe knee SA.This approach effectively controls infection and preserves joint function, warranting broader clinical adoption.Fig. 1 (Abstract O1).The specific operation process and steps of parallel osteotomy.In Fig. A, it can be seen that SAK has invaded the cartilage, and there is obvious joint destruction.Fig. B, self-made parallel osteotomy; Fig. C-E.Parallel osteotomy is used to make flexion and extension Spaces.Fig. F, complete effect of osteotomy

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

A 2026 study studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c195de0f0f753b39bee4https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-026-00376-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper