PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi0 citations

Development of Marital Happiness Scale

CÖCemile Dur ÖztürkİYİbrahim Yıldırım

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop and validate the Marital Happiness Scale (MHS) for assessing happiness in marriages.
  • Conducted exploratory factor analysis (EFA) on data from 420 married individuals.
  • Performed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on data from 221 participants.
  • Examined criterion validity using data from 272 individuals, focusing on correlations with other scales.
  • EFA identified two factors: Emotional Intimacy and Marital Commitment, explaining 70% of total variance.
  • CFA confirmed the two-factor model's construct validity.
  • MHS showed high positive correlation with the Spouse Support Scale (SSS) and moderate negative correlation with the Couple Burnout Scale (CBMS).
  • Reliability testing yielded Cronbach's α of .97, McDonald's ω of .97, and a test-retest reliability coefficient of r = .85.

Abstract

This study presents the Marital Happiness Scale (MHS), a tool designed to assess the degree of happiness associated with various aspects of marriage among married individuals. The validity of the MHS was tested using three methods: exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and criterion validity testing. EFA was conducted on data from 420 married individuals, CFA on data from 221 participants, and criterion validity was examined using data from 272 individuals. EFA results indicated that the MHS comprises two factors, namely Emotional Intimacy and Marital Commitment, which together explained 70% of the total variance. CFA confirmed the construct validity of the two-factor model. The criterion validity of the MHS was assessed by examining the correlation coefficients between the MHS and the Spouse Support Scale (SSS) and the Couple Burnout Scale-Short Version (CBMS). The MHS demonstrated a significant and positive correlation with the SSS at a high level and a significant but negative correlation with the CBMS at a moderate level. The reliability of the MHS was tested using three methods: Cronbach's alpha (α), McDonald's omega (ω), and test-retest reliability coefficients. For the MHS, Cronbach's α and McDonald’s ω were both .97, and the test–retest reliability coefficient was r = .85. The results indicate that the MHS is a valid, reliable, and useful instrument for measuring happiness in married individuals.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Öztürk et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c247de0f0f753b39c856https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1653019
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper