PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Comparative behavior of steam turbine model for dynamical power system analyses by means of multiple fractional and artificial neural network techniques

KAKashif Ali AbroBSBasma SouayehAFAymen Flah

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a predictive model for steam turbines using artificial neural networks and fractional techniques.
  • Utilized artificial neural network analysis for predictive modeling.
  • Developed dynamic mathematical models using modern fractional differentials.
  • Applied mathematical techniques such as Laplace and Sumudu transforms.
  • Analyzed various performance metrics including fit, error, and training dynamics.
  • Developed a mathematical model for steam turbines indicating high efficiency.
  • Validation performance was compared across different epochs.
  • Demonstrated effective estimates of output-to-input ratios as a dynamic response.
  • Found specific relationships between absolute error and pressure, and other performance metrics.

Abstract

Steam turbine is pivotal in industrial and power generation because it has become an essential technology for optimization of energy that efficiently converts thermal energy from steam into mechanical energy. This manuscript proposes a predictive modelling of steam turbine by invoking artificial neural network analysis and develops dynamic mathematical model for steam turbine via multiple fractional techniques. A novel mathematical model for steam turbine is developed by means modern fractional differentials and artificial neural network subject to steady-state condition for high efficiency and long operation. For seeking the transfer function, mathematical techniques of Laplace and Sumudu transforms, rectified linear function, mean squared error have been invoked to have estimation for ratio of output to input as a dynamic response. At last, the comparison of best validation performance versus epoch, absolute error versus pressure, training dynamics versus epoch, error histogram versus targets and actual scale versus predicted scale in terms of fit have been deeply discussed for the efficiency of steam turbine.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abro et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c247de0f0f753b39c8b5https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45449-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper