PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer6 citationsOpen Access

Locoregional delivery of CAR T cells in high-grade gliomas: a systematic analysis of safety, efficacy, and emerging biomarkers of response

View Full Paper
CRChristian K RamsoomairMDManav DaftariRBRami Benchouia

Key Points

  • This review evaluates the safety and efficacy of locoregional CAR-T cell delivery compared to systemic administration in high-grade gliomas.
  • Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines on locoregional vs systemic CAR-T cell delivery
  • Analysis of 112 studies with 16 articles meeting inclusion criteria
  • Compared incidence of adverse events and therapeutic responses using meta-analysis
  • Locoregional delivery reduced grade ≥3 adverse events by over 60% compared to systemic delivery (RR=0.39)
  • Encouraging disease response rates were seen with locoregional administration (RR=3.79)
  • Cerebrospinal fluid analysis allowed monitoring of T-cell activity and identification of emerging biomarkers

Abstract

Background Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy represents a promising frontier in oncology, but its application to high-grade gliomas (HGG) is challenged by the blood-brain barrier, limited efficacy, and significant toxicities associated with systemic administration. Locoregional delivery has the potential to address these shortcomings. This systematic review evaluates the safety and efficacy of locoregional vs systemic CAR-T cell delivery for HGG. Methods Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a total of 112 studies were identified from three separate databases between 2015 and 2024. Of these, 19 articles were assessed for eligibility, resulting in 16 articles meeting the inclusion criteria with 194 treated patients across 14 clinical trials. A comparative meta-analysis was performed to compare the safety and efficacy outcomes of locoregional administration (eg, intracerebroventricular, intratumoral) with systemic (intravenous) delivery. Severe (grade ≥3) adverse event rates and therapeutic responses were pooled to calculate crude incidence, rate ratios, and relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs. Both fixed-effect and random-effects models were used to evaluate incidence rate ratios. Results Locoregional delivery was associated with a markedly improved safety profile, demonstrating an over 60% reduction in the incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events compared with systemic infusion (RR=0.39; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.52; p<0.001). Furthermore, locoregional strategies demonstrated encouraging signals of antitumor activity, including rates of disease responses not widely observed with systemic approaches (RR=3.79; 95% CI 1.23 to 11.70; p<0.05). Locoregional delivery also enables the analysis of cerebrospinal fluid to monitor T-cell trafficking and emerging biomarkers of immune activation. Conclusion Intracranial delivery of CAR-T cells helps overcome key barriers that limit the efficacy and safety of systemic therapy in brain tumors. These findings support a paradigm shift that integrates locoregional delivery techniques as a pivotal component in the design of future CAR-T cell trials, offering a safer and potentially more effective therapeutic approach with greater opportunities for longitudinal sampling for patients with HGG.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ramsoomair et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c247de0f0f753b39c91bhttps://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2025-014450
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper