PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Journal of European Landscapes0 citationsOpen Access

Participatory Governance under the European Landscape Convention: Between Rhetoric and Empowerment

MUMimi Urbanc

Key Points

  • The research examines how the European Landscape Convention fosters community empowerment and identifies barriers to genuine participation.
  • Systematic mapping of 39 peer-reviewed publications and book chapters from 2007-2024
  • Analysis of participatory design and implementation outcomes
  • Identification of enabling factors and structural barriers
  • Genuine community empowerment practices, such as delegated decision-making, are rare
  • Full community involvement correlates with successful implementation of governance
  • Structural barriers like bureaucracy and centralized power limit the depth of participation
  • Enabling factors include supportive policy environments and capacity-building efforts

Abstract

The European Landscape Convention (ELC) has made participation the cornerstone of democratic and inclusive landscape governance. However, 25 years after its adoption, the question arises as to the extent to which ELC promotes genuine community empowerment or perpetuates top-down control under participatory rhetoric. This systematic mapping synthesizes 39 peer-reviewed publications and book chapters (2007–2024) that examine participatory design, barriers and enabling factors, and implementation and implementation outcomes. The analysis revealed a wide range of participatory practices, yet empowered forms, such as delegated decision-making and self-management, are rare. Full community involvement correlates strongly with successful implementation, yet structural barriers—bureaucracy, centralized power, limited resources, and policy misalignment—often limit the depth of participation. Enabling factors include a supportive policy environment, capacity-building, and mobilization of local knowledge, with innovative tools such as participatory GIS enhancing engagement. Although examples of transformative co-governance exist, participation often remains procedural rather than genuinely redistributive. Strengthening the legal framework for co-decision-making and applying robust empowerment indicators are essential for moving from symbolic inclusion toward meaningful governance. This study offers an integrated understanding of how the participatory aims of ELC are realized, informing efforts to foster resilient, equitable, and democratic landscape governance across Europe.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mimi Urbanc (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c2d1de0f0f753b39d34chttps://doi.org/10.5117/jel2025.3.003.urba
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cultural Landscape Planning in Rural Contexts: A Comparative Appraisal of GIS-based and other Participatory Methods2026
  2. 2Enhancing Landscape Convention for Climate Resilience with New European Bauhaus Values and Principles2025
  3. 3Participatory modeling for collaborative landscape and environmental planning: From potential to realization2024 · 32 citations
  4. 4Crisis, Geographies of Dispossession and Contested Territories: for a Global Landscape Convention2025
  5. 5Top-down and bottom-up initiatives for the Walloon landscapes and their inhabitants2024 · 1 citations