PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Spherical Geometry and Holonomy Signatures in Affective Space: Computational Evidence from fMRI Emotion Trajectories

View Full Paper
RRRoman Radchenko

Key Points

  • The research investigates whether emotional representations can be better modeled using spherical geometry instead of traditional flat models.
  • Utilized the Emo-FilM fMRI dataset with 29 participants and 14 films.
  • Projected Valence-Arousal-Dominance (VAD) norms onto spherical coordinates.
  • Conducted eight computational tests to analyze affective loop characteristics and distances.
  • S²-geodesic distances correlated with MDS trajectories (ρ = 0.704 ± 0.042).
  • Solid angle of quasi-loops predicted loop-closure error (partial ρ = 0.382, p = 1.4 × 10⁻¹⁰).
  • Measured transitions across the valence equator showed S² distances were 2.4× larger than flat MDS (p = 9.2 × 10⁻¹⁵).
  • Ellipsoidal S² showed superior model fit compared to round S² by ΔAIC = −15.7.

Abstract

Emotional representations are typically modelled in flat Euclidean space following Russell's (1980) two-dimensional valence-arousal circumplex. The Affective Spin Bundle Hypothesis (ASBH; Radchenko, 2026) proposes that affective state space has spherical geometry (S²), with parallel transport along closed trajectories producing geometric holonomy proportional to the enclosed solid angle—a signature impossible in any flat geometry. We test this hypothesis computationally using the publicly available Emo-FilM fMRI dataset (Ma N = 29 participants, 14 films, 13 emotion categories), projecting Warriner et al. (2013) Valence–Arousal–Dominance (VAD) norms onto S² as a priori coordinates independent of the fMRI data. Eight computational tests yield four key results: (1) S²-geodesic step distances correlate with the authors’ 2D MDS trajectories at ρ = 0.704 ± 0.042 across all 14 films; (2) solid angle enclosed by affective quasi-loops independently predicts loop-closure error (partial ρ = 0.382, p = 1.4 × 10⁻¹⁰, n = 263 non-overlapping loops); (3) transitions crossing the valence equator are 2.4× larger in S²-geodesic than flat MDS distance (p = 9.2 × 10⁻¹⁵); (4) an ellipsoidal S² with density potential outperforms round S² by ΔAIC = −15.7, with separate optima for behavioral similarity (λᴅ/λv = 3.8) and holonomy dynamics (λᴅ/λv ≈ 1.1), suggesting a non-Levi-Civita connection. These results support ASBH and motivate replacing flat MDS with spherical coordinates in hippocampal-prefrontal decoding models.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Roman Radchenko (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c2e4de0f0f753b39d5fchttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19250404
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper