PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Cancer1 citationsOpen Access

Baseline tumor burden and outcomes in patients with rare cancers treated with immunotherapy (Southwest Oncology Group trial S1609)

View Full Paper
PSPaul L. SwiecickiMOMegan OthusSPSandip Pravin Patel

Key Points

  • Investigate the relationship between baseline tumor burden and survival outcomes in patients with rare cancers receiving immunotherapy.
  • Phase 2 basket study involving 722 patients with rare malignancies treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab.
  • Baseline tumor burden measured by the sum of target lesion dimensions.
  • Primary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
  • Statistical analyses included multivariable assessments and Fisher exact tests.
  • Larger baseline tumor burden was associated with shorter overall survival (OS).
  • No correlation was found between baseline tumor burden and progression-free survival (PFS).
  • A weak negative association was noted between tumor burden and tumor regression at the first scan.
  • Multivariable analyses indicated that baseline tumor burden and any tumor regression independently affected OS.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background It has been suggested that baseline tumor burden may correlate with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) outcome for individual tumor types in which ICIs are standardly used. The authors investigated whether pretreatment tumor burden correlates with overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), and tumor regression among patients who had rare cancers treated with dual ICIs. Methods Southwest Oncology Group study S1609 was a phase 2, National Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group basket study (>1000 sites) evaluating nivolumab plus ipilimumab in 53 cohorts of patients who had rare/ultrarare malignancies (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02834013). Overall, 722 patients were included in this secondary analysis, all of whom had measurable disease (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1). Baseline tumor burden, defined as the sum of the greatest dimensions of target lesions at study registration, was analyzed based on quartiles observed in the data. The number of target lesions was also considered a secondary tumor burden measure. End points included OS and PFS. Results Larger baseline tumor burden correlated with shorter OS, but not PFS (multivariable analysis). Higher baseline tumor burden quartiles had only a weak negative association with any tumor regression at first scan (Fisher exact test, p = .09), and multivariable analyses further indicated that both tumor burden and any tumor regression at first posttreatment scan were independently associated with OS in multivariable analysis (comparing a baseline tumor size ≥12.9 cm vs. 1.0–4.8 cm; hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–1.72; p = .032), but there was no evidence of an interaction between tumor burden and any tumor regression at the first scan ( p for interaction > .65). Conclusions Larger baseline tumor burden was associated with worse OS, but not PFS, and was not predictive of tumor regression after dual ICI therapy in a large cohort with rare cancer types.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Swiecicki et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c324de0f0f753b39dcc6https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.70374
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper