PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Charge-sign dependent drift effects in the time-lag of cosmic-ray variation relative to solar activity observed with CALET

View Full Paper
OAO AdrianiYAY AkaikeKAK Asano

Key Points

  • To investigate the variations in cosmic-ray flux and their time-lag relative to solar activity across different solar cycles.
  • Analyzed long-term neutron monitor data for cosmic-ray flux variations.
  • Examined the time-lag in proton and electron fluxes observed by the Calorimetric Electron Telescope (CALET).
  • Compared data from CALET with that from AMS-02 during varying solar cycle conditions.
  • Found an average time-lag of ∼1 year, but longer in odd solar cycles and shorter in even cycles.
  • Identified a charge-sign dependent time-lag: protons showed shorter time-lags while electrons showed longer during specific solar polarities.
  • Results suggest distinct 11-year time profiles for protons and electrons during different epoch conditions.

Abstract

The 11-yr variation of galactic cosmic-ray flux lags behind the variation of the sunspot number. An average ∼1-yr time-lag is expected from the outward propagating solar wind with the frozen-in photospheric magnetic field varying in the solar cycle, and from the inward diffusive transport of cosmic-ray particles. The long-term neutron monitor data, however, show that the time-lag is significantly longer (shorter) in the odd (even) solar cycle. In this paper, we analyze the time-lag in proton and electron fluxes observed by the Calorimetric Electron Telescope (CALET). It is found that the time-lag is similar in proton and electron fluxes during an A > 0 polarity epoch of the solar dipole magnetic field. In an even solar cycle 24 including a polarity reversal from A 0, on the other hand, it is found that the time-lag of proton (electron) flux variation is significantly shorter (longer) than the average ∼1-yr lag by analyzing the combined data with CALET and AMS-02. This is the first observation of the charge-sign dependent time-lag. We demonstrate that these observations can be qualitatively interpreted in terms of different 11-yr time profiles of proton and electron fluxes in A > 0 and A < 0 epochs expected from the drift effect.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Adriani et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c336de0f0f753b39ddb5https://doi.org/10.13016/m26oye-usgq
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Observations of the eleven-year cosmic-ray modulation cycle1976 · 74 citations
  2. 2Effects of particle drift on cosmic-ray transport. I - General properties, application to solar modulation1977 · 493 citations
  3. 3International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the thirteenth generation2021 · 998 citations
  4. 4Effects of drift on the transport of cosmic rays. VI - A three-dimensional model including diffusion1983 · 428 citations
  5. 5Effects of drift on the transport of cosmic rays. IV - Modulation by a wavy interplanetary current sheet1981 · 416 citations