PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Medicine2 citationsOpen Access

Assessment of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in older adults undergoing total knee arthroplasty

View Full Paper
PHPengxi HeQXQiang XuYFYong Feng

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on recovery and safety in older adults after total knee arthroplasty.
  • Retrospective cohort analysis of 400 patients aged 65 or older
  • Participants divided into ERAS (200) and conventional (200) groups
  • Evaluated perioperative parameters including length of stay and pain intensity
  • ERAS group had a shorter length of stay (6.20 vs 9.50 days, P < .001)
  • Earlier mobilization in ERAS group (1.60 vs 2.80 days, P < .001)
  • Lower pain scores on postoperative days 1 and 3 in ERAS (both P < .001)
  • Greater knee flexion at discharge in ERAS (105.30° vs 92.60°, P < .001)
  • Higher patient satisfaction in ERAS (92.5% vs 78.0%, P = .001)

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the influence of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) application on postoperative recovery dynamics and safety profiles in elderly total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on 400 individuals aged 65 years or older who underwent primary unilateral TKA between January 2022 and December 2023. According to perioperative management strategies, participants were divided into an ERAS group (n = 200) managed with a standardized multimodal care pathway and a conventional group (n = 200) receiving routine treatment. Comparative evaluations included perioperative parameters such as time to first ambulation, hospital stay duration (length of stay), pain intensity measured by the visual analog scale, knee range of motion at discharge, postoperative complication incidence, and overall patient satisfaction. No significant differences were found in baseline demographic or comorbidity profiles between the 2 cohorts ( P >.05). Compared with the conventional management pathway, ERAS implementation was associated with a significantly shorter length of stay (6.20 ± 1.80 vs 9.50 ± 2.30 days, P <.001), earlier mobilization (1.60 ± 0.50 vs 2.80 ± 0.90 days, P <.001), lower visual analog scale pain scores on postoperative days 1 and 3 (both P <.001), and greater knee flexion at discharge (105.30 ± 9.40° vs 92.60 ± 10.80°, P <.001). Although the overall complication rate was numerically lower in the ERAS group (6.0% vs 8.5%, P = .358), the difference was not statistically significant. Notably, patient satisfaction markedly improved in the ERAS cohort (92.5% vs 78.0%, P = .001). Implementation of the ERAS pathway in elderly patients undergoing TKA significantly enhances postoperative functional recovery, reduces pain, and increases satisfaction while maintaining a comparable safety profile. These findings support ERAS as a reliable, multidisciplinary, and cost-effective perioperative management strategy for geriatric TKA care. These findings suggest potential clinical and healthcare efficiency benefits; however, formal economic evaluations are required to confirm cost-effectiveness.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

He et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c336de0f0f753b39de48https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000048011
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper