PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Geoscientific model development2 citationsOpen Access

PM 2.5 assimilation within JEDI for NOAA's regional Air Quality Model (AQMv7): application to the September 2020 Western US wildfires

HWHongli WangCMCory MartinJBJérôme Barré

Key Points

  • The study aims to enhance aerosol data assimilation capabilities for improved air quality forecasting using PM2.5 observations.
  • Established PM2.5 assimilation within the JEDI framework.
  • Conducted cycling data assimilation experiments from September 1–21, 2020.
  • Utilized PM2.5 observations from the AirNow and PurpleAir networks for model integration.
  • Assimilating PM2.5 observations reduced forecast errors for 1–24 hours based on mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE).
  • Significant reductions in errors were noted in areas impacted by smoke from wildfires.
  • Combining PurpleAir observations with AirNow data resulted in slight further improvements in 3–24 h MAE.

Abstract

Abstract. This paper describes efforts to establish aerosol data assimilation capabilities for NOAA's National Air Quality Forecasting Capability (NAQFC), a regional online air quality modeling (AQM) system under NOAA's Unified Forecast System (UFS), by assimilating measurements of fine particulate matter (PM2.5, particles with aerodynamic diameters less than 2.5 µm). PM2.5 assimilation is developed within the Joint Effort for Data assimilation Integration (JEDI) framework and tested using its 3D-Var data assimilation (DA) component. The PM2.5 observation operator is constructed by combining newly developed PM2.5 transformation recipes in the JEDI Variable Derivation Repository (VADER) with a general spatial interpolation operator in the Unified Forward Operator (UFO). Cycled DA and forecast experiments were conducted from 1–21 September 2020, during a period of Western US wildfires, to assess the impact of assimilating PM2.5 observations from the AirNow and PurpleAir networks. The control and analysis variables include individual aerosol species, with background error standard deviations generated by scaling their respective background values. Prognostic variables such as aerosol particle number and total particulate surface area are updated accordingly following each analysis update. All DA experiments use a 3-hourly cycling interval, with PM2.5 observations assimilated every 3 h. The control experiment uses the same configuration but without any data assimilation. Results show that assimilating either AirNow or PurpleAir PM2.5 data reduces 1–24 h forecast errors in terms of mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) compared to the control run over Continental United States (CONUS). Substantial improvements are in regions where fire events took place and largely affected by transported smoke. Overall, the assimilation of PurpleAir observations in addition to AirNow data leads to a slight reduction in 3–24 h MAE.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c34bde0f0f753b39dfa9https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2479-2026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper