PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Slovak Journal of Civil Engineering1 citationsOpen Access

Building A Greener Future: Transforming Industrial Waste Into Sustainable Materials

ACAbhishek ChandaSTSonal Thakkar

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the effectiveness of industrial waste as sustainable materials for construction.
  • Evaluated fly ash, GGBFS, and CCR as precursors for alkali-activated binders.
  • Prepared paste and mortar specimens with a 4% sodium hydroxide activator.
  • Incorporated CCR as an additive and partial replacement at 0-10% dosages.
  • Assessed the effects of ambient and heat curing on geopolymerization.
  • Conducted microstructural analyses using SEM and XRD.
  • A CCR content of 2.5% produced optimal mechanical performance in blended systems.
  • Heat curing at 60 °C positively influenced strength development.
  • Microstructural analyses confirmed the formation of beneficial C-S-H and C-A-S-H gels.

Abstract

Abstract The construction sector significantly contributes to global carbon emissions, largely due to the widespread use of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC). This study investigates fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS), and calcium carbide residue (CCR) as sustainable precursors for one-part alkali-activated binders. Paste and mortar specimens were prepared using a single activator comprising 4% sodium hydroxide by precursor weight, with CCR incorporated as both an additive and partial replacement at dosages of 0-10%. The results show that a CCR content of 2.5% yields an optimal mechanical performance in GGBFS-based and fly ash–GGBFS blended systems. The effects of ambient and heat curing at 60 °C on geopolymerization and strength development were evaluated. Microstructural analyses using SEM and XRD confirmed the formation of C-S-H and C-A-S-H gels, which supports the strength trends observed. Overall, the study demonstrates that CCR can serve as an effective, low-cost auxiliary activator, which enables the development of sustainable and low-carbon construction materials while offering environmental, social, and economic benefits.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chanda et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c35cde0f0f753b39e1abhttps://doi.org/10.2478/sjce-2026-0006
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Recycling potential evaluation of geopolymer concrete with different cementitious system used in freeze-thaw environment2024 · 7 citations
  2. 2Industrial Calcium Byproduct Waste: Sustainable Construction Materials for Building Applications2025 · 6 citations
  3. 3Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: A comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete2013 · 2,395 citations
  4. 4Cementing Material from Calcium Carbide Residue-Rice Husk Ash2003 · 144 citations
  5. 5Green house gas emissions due to concrete manufacture2007 · 886 citations