PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026PLoS ONE2 citationsOpen Access

Inflammation in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: Evaluation of hematological biomarkers and potential prognostic value

View Full Paper
TNTrần Cảnh Tùng NguyenDPDao Doan Trinh PhanTDThi Huyen Do

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore the role of hematological inflammatory biomarkers in nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head and their potential for prognosis.
  • Conducted a retrospective analysis on 80 patients with nontraumatic ONFH and 110 control individuals.
  • Compared peripheral blood cell counts, C-reactive protein, and inflammatory indices across groups and disease stages.
  • Performed ROC curve analysis to assess diagnostic performance of biomarkers.
  • Patients with ONFH exhibited significantly higher CRP, monocyte count, and inflammatory ratios compared to controls.
  • CRP and monocyte count showed the highest diagnostic accuracy with AUCs of 0.700 and 0.690, respectively.
  • CRP levels varied across disease stages, peaking at stage II, while other indices remained consistent.

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that inflammation and immune imbalance are associated with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). This study aimed to investigate peripheral inflammatory biomarkers in patients with nontraumatic ONFH and assess their potential prognostic value. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 80 patients with nontraumatic ONFH and 110 control individuals without ONFH. Peripheral blood cell counts, C-reactive protein (CRP), and derived inflammatory indices including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) were compared between groups and among different disease stages. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The results showed that ONFH patients showed significantly higher CRP, monocyte count (cM), monocyte percentage (pM), MLR, and platelet count (PLT). ROC analysis revealed that CRP (AUC = 0.700, sensitivity = 71.3%, specificity = 65.5%) and cM (AUC = 0.690, sensitivity = 82.5%) had the highest diagnostic accuracy. CRP levels differed significantly across disease stages, peaking at stage II (P = 0.0107), while other indices remained stable. These findings support the concept that both systemic and local inflammatory mechanisms contribute to the pathogenesis of ONFH. CRP and monocyte indices may serve as inexpensive, accessible adjuncts for early disease screening and monitoring.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nguyen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c371de0f0f753b39e30chttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0346158
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper