PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Informatics1 citationsOpen Access

Ethics in Artificial Intelligence: A Cross-Sectoral Review of 2019–2025

View Full Paper
CLCharalampos M. LiapisNFNikos FazakisSKSotiris Kotsiantis

Key Points

  • The review aims to synthesize ethics literature on AI from 2019 to 2025, focusing on frameworks and implications across sectors.
  • Conducted a systematic scoping review of publications and policy developments.
  • Framed the analysis around four meta-dimensions: trust and transparency, bias and fairness, governance and regulation, justice.
  • Examined case studies in healthcare, education, media, law, and industry to illustrate ethical challenges.
  • Identified significant concerns around accountability and algorithmic bias in healthcare.
  • Highlighted the need for improved trust and transparency in AI applications.
  • Proposed a governance framework advocating for ethics-by-design and pluralistic governance.

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has transitioned from a specialized research area to a ubiquitous socio-technical infrastructure influencing sectors from healthcare and law to manufacturing and defense. In tandem with its transformative promise, AI has created an exponentially expanding ethics literature questioning, fairness, transparency, accountability, and justice. This review synthesizes publications and key policy developments between 2019 and 2025, bringing sectoral discourses together with cross-cutting frameworks. Grounded in a systematic scoping review methodology, we frame the field along four meta-dimensions: trust and transparency, bias and fairness, governance & regulation, and justice, while we investigate their expression across diverse sectors. Special attention is dedicated to healthcare (patient trust and algorithmic bias), education (integrity and authorship), media (misinformation), law (accountability), and the industrial sector (data integrity, intellectual property protection, and environmental safety). We ground abstract principles in concrete case studies to illustrate real-world harms and mitigation strategies. Furthermore, we incorporate pluralistic ethics (e.g., Ubuntu, Islamic perspectives), environmental ethics, and emerging challenges posed by Generative AI and neuro-AI interfaces. To bridge theory and practice, we propose an operational governance framework for organizations. We contend that success involves transitioning from principles toward ethics-by-design, pluralistic governance, sustainability, and adaptive oversight. This review is intended for scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who need a comprehensive and actionable framework for navigating the complex landscape of AI ethics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liapis et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c371de0f0f753b39e32fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/informatics13040051
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper