PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Applied Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Continuous Emotion Recognition Using EDA-Graphs: A Graph Signal Processing Approach for Affective Dimension Estimation

View Full Paper
LMLuis R. Mercado-DiazYKYoungsun KongJKJosef Kundrát

Key Points

  • The research aims to improve emotion recognition by using electrodermal activity analyzed through graph signal processing.
  • Developed a pipeline for analyzing electrodermal activity (EDA) using graph signal processing.
  • Compared EDA-graph features with traditional time- and frequency-domain EDA features and other physiological signals.
  • Utilized machine learning regression models to detect affective dimensions in a dataset of continuously annotated emotions.
  • Achieved RMSE values of 0.801 for arousal and 0.714 for valence, outpacing state-of-the-art models.
  • Classified emotional states with 98.2% accuracy for positive/negative/mixed emotions.
  • Discriminated between emotions like relaxed, amused, bored, scared, and neutral with 92.75% accuracy.
  • Detected stress with an accuracy of 86.54%.

Abstract

Emotion recognition from physiological signals has immense applications in healthcare and human–computer interaction. We developed an electrodermal activity (EDA)-graph signal processing pipeline that produces highly sensitive features for detecting the affective dimensions (arousal and valence) of emotions. Using the Continuously Annotated Signals of Emotion dataset, we compared our graph-based EDA features (EDA-graph) with traditional time- and frequency-domain EDA features and features derived from other signals (heart rate variability, pulse transit time, electromyography, skin temperature, and respiration) for detecting affective dimensions using machine learning regression models. The EDA-graph features showed superior performance in continuous affective dimension recognition compared to the most accurate state-of-the-art models, achieving RMSE values of 0.801 for arousal and 0.714 for valence. Furthermore, we used a variety of traditional and recently published datasets collected in laboratory and ambulatory settings to perform a comprehensive evaluation of the robust generalization capabilities of our approach across different emotional contexts. The models demonstrated exceptional performance in classifying emotional states across the datasets, achieving 98.2% accuracy in detecting positive, negative, and mixed emotions; 92.75% in discriminating between emotions (relaxed, amused, bored, scared, and neutral); and 86.54% in detecting stress vs. no stress. These results highlight the potential of a graph-based analysis of EDA in emotion recognition systems in different contexts, especially for real-world applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mercado-Diaz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c384de0f0f753b39e671https://doi.org/10.3390/app16073240
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper