PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Surgical Neurology International0 citations

Effect of intraoperative events on quality of life in patients following clipping of ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms

View Full Paper
ASAdnan Hussain ShahidMMManju MohantyNSNavneet Singla

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate how intraoperative events affect the quality of life in patients post-aneurysm clipping.
  • Recruited 94 patients into two groups: those with and without intraoperative events.
  • Quality of life assessed using SSQOL and WHO QOL-brief after one year.
  • Defined intraoperative events as rupture during dissection or clipping time over 3 minutes.
  • Post-one year, both groups showed comparable quality of life.
  • 48.9% in the intraoperative events group had poor quality of life on SSQOL compared to 38.8% in the control group.
  • On WHOQOL-BREF, 13.3% of patients in the events group and 10.2% in the control group reported poor quality of life.

Abstract

Background: A significant subset of patients undergoing clipping for ruptured aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH) continues to have impaired physical and psychological functions impacting the quality of life (QOL). The determinants of QOL are multifactorial. Surgical events such as intraoperative rupture and temporary clipping time are known to affect the Glasgow outcome score. However, the impact of these events on QOL has not been described to date. The aim of the study is to assess the effect of intraoperative events on QOL in the patient with ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms (ACA) clipping. Methods: A total of 94 patients were recruited into two groups of patients without or with any intraoperative events. QOL was assessed using stroke-specific QOL (SSQOL) and World Health Organization (WHO) QOL-brief assessment instrument (BREF) after 1 year of an event. Intraoperative events were defined as (1) intraoperative rupture during dissection, (2) temporary clipping time of more than 3 min. Results: Both groups were comparable on sociodemographic variables. After 1 year of SAH, both groups were identical on both measures of QOL. However, 48.9% of patients in Group B had poor QOL compared to 38.8% of patients in Group A on SSQOL. The most affected domain was energy. On WHOQOL-BREF, only 13.3% of patients in Group B and 10.2% in Group A had poor QOL. The difference in QOL outcome assessed by two scales was attributed to the difference in the nature of the scales. Conclusion: Although QOL was affected following a-SAH, intraoperative events were not found to be contributing toward the difference in QOL at 1 year.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shahid et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c3a8de0f0f753b39ea88https://doi.org/10.25259/sni_1181_2025
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper