PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 30, 2026Poultry Science0 citationsOpen Access

Carcass characteristics and physicochemical and sensory properties of meat from three species of wild geese hunted in Poland

View Full Paper
PPPaweł PiekarczykPDPiotr DomaradzkiMFMariusz Florek

Key Points

  • This research characterizes carcass traits and evaluates physicochemical and sensory properties of goose meat from different species.
  • Analyzed 45 carcasses of three wild goose species and two domestic breeds.
  • Evaluated proximate composition, pH, colour, water-holding capacity, heme pigments, lipid oxidation, texture, and sensory properties.
  • Statistical comparisons were made between wild and domestic geese.
  • Wild geese showed significant interspecific differences in carcass traits.
  • Greylag Goose had the highest body weight, while Greater White-fronted Goose had the lowest.
  • Wild geese exhibited darker meat with higher heme pigments and lower water expressibility.

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize the carcass traits, physicochemical and sensory properties of meat from three wild goose species ‒ Greater White-fronted Goose ( Anser albifrons ), Greylag Goose ( Anser anser ), and Bean Goose ( Anser fabalis ) ‒ and compare them with two domestic breeds, White Kołuda® and Biłgorajska. Forty-five carcasses (nine males of each species/breed) were analysed. Breast and leg muscles were evaluated for proximate composition, pH, colour, water-holding capacity, heme pigments, lipid oxidation (TBARS), and texture, followed by a sensory assessment of cooked breast meat. Statistical comparisons focused on the effect of species (among wild geese) and goose type (wild vs domestic). Wild geese differed considerably in carcass traits, reflecting inherent interspecific morphometric variation. Among the wild species, Greylag Goose showed the highest body and empty body weights, and edible carcass component weights, while the Greater White-fronted Goose exhibited the lowest values. The White Kołuda® breed (WK), compared with wild geese, displayed the greatest total body weight and heaviest edible parts; however, the percentage of breast muscle was approximately twice as high in wild birds. Domestic goose meat ‒ particularly from WK ‒ contained more intramuscular fat and moisture but less protein, and had lower pH both before and after thawing. In contrast, Biłgorajska geese showed values closer to those of wild birds. Wild geese had darker meat with higher heme pigment content, lower expressible water in breast, and greater susceptibility to oxidation (higher TBARS). Domestic geese, especially Biłgorajska, showed higher shear force and energy in both raw and cooked breast. Sensory evaluation indicated that WK breast had a more intense meat aroma but was less juicy and tender; simultaneously wild geese displayed higher juiciness and tenderness but also a higher intensity of off-odours and off-flavors. Across all groups, overall acceptability exceeded 8 on a 10-point scale. These findings confirm substantial phenotypic and qualitative differences between wild and domestic geese, most likely associated with domestication, including reduced locomotor activity and selection for meat production.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Piekarczyk et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c9c5a4f8fdd13afe0bd84chttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2026.106877
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Carcass characteristics, chemical composition, physicochemical, texture, and sensory properties of meat from White Kołuda® geese2026
  2. 2Changes in carcase composition, gastrointestinal morphometry and leg bone dimensions in different goose genotypes after a four-year reproductive period2025
  3. 3Carcass Traits, Meat Quality and Nutritional Profiles of Wild Egyptian Geese (Alopochen aegyptiaca) and Wigeon (Anas penelope).2024
  4. 4Proximate Composition, Physicochemical Properties and Concentration of Selected Minerals in Edible Giblets of Geese2025
  5. 5Some carcass and meat quality characteristics of Anatolian local and Mast geese in semi-intensive conditions2026