PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 30, 2026International Journal of Hydrogen Energy5 citationsOpen Access

Review of hydrogen storage using AB, AB2, HEA, and solid solution metal hydrides

View Full Paper
DMDaniela Bellon MonsalveCKChourouk KefiUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresNKNejc KlopčičResearch Center Pharmaceutical Engineering (Austria)

Key Points

  • This review aims to compare various metal hydride types for hydrogen storage efficiency and identify key performance factors.
  • Conducted a cross-family comparison of AB-type, AB2-type, HEA, and solid-solution hydrides.
  • Evaluated maximum and reversible hydrogen capacities using consistent metrics.
  • Assessed thermodynamics, kinetics, and stability for each hydride group.
  • Incorporated cost normalization based on raw element prices.
  • Clarified links between hydrogen capacity and thermodynamic properties.
  • Identified key degradation pathways affecting long-term performance.
  • Outlined research priorities beyond maximizing hydrogen capacity.

Abstract

Achieving Net Zero CO 2 emissions by 2050 requires efficient and reliable energy storage solutions. Hydrogen is considered a key energy vector, but its practical deployment depends on safe and compact storage systems. Metal hydrides offer high volumetric density and moderate operating pressures, but their performance is often limited by thermodynamics, kinetics, activation requirements, and cost. This review presents a cross-family comparison of hydrogen storage in AB-type, AB 2 -type, high-entropy alloys (HEAs), and body-centered cubic solid-solution hydrides. Rather than treating these alloy systems independently, they are compared using consistent metrics, distinguishing maximum and reversible hydrogen capacities and relating performance to reported pressure-temperature conditions. An indicative cost normalization (US/kg H 2), based on raw element prices, is also incorporated to contextualize material selection. • A critical comparison of AB, AB 2, HEA and solid-solution hydrides is presented. • Links between capacity, thermodynamics and cycling stability are clarified. • Key degradation pathways controlling long-term reversibility are identified. • Research priorities beside maximum hydrogen capacity is outlined.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Monsalve et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ca1280883daed6ee095060https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.154686
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Introduction and Research Trends in Hydrogen Storage Alloys for Solid-state Hydrogen Storage2025
  2. 2Metal Hydrides for Hydrogen Storage: Overview and Performance Evaluation Methods2025
  3. 3A Comparative Study of Metal Hydrides as Efficient Storage Solution for Green Hydrogen2025
  4. 4Review: next-generation metal hydride systems for sustainable hydrogen storage—kinetics, nanostructuring, and intelligent materials discovery2026 · 3 citations
  5. 5Magnesium-Based Hydrides and High-Entropy Alloys: A Review of Advancements and Pathways for Next-Generation Hydrogen Storage Materials2026