PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 31, 2026Environment Development and Sustainability1 citationsOpen Access

How Do external shocks shape the dynamic relationships between the EU carbon emissions trading market and fossil energy markets?

ZGZehui GuoSNShujie NameXCXiaoyang Chen

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how external events, like the COVID-19 pandemic and geopolitical conflicts, influence the relationship between carbon emissions trading and fossil energy markets.
  • Analyzed daily data from 2018 to 2023.
  • Employed DCC-GARCH and TVP-SV-VAR models to assess time-varying correlations.
  • Explored impulse response analysis for different types of shocks.
  • Carbon market shows the strongest correlation with natural gas prices.
  • Pandemic caused a decline in both energy and carbon prices.
  • Russia-Ukraine conflict triggered supply disruptions, leading to diverging price trends.
  • Demand shocks resulted in simultaneous price fluctuations, while supply shocks caused opposite movements.

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine conflict, this study investigates the dynamic correlation between the EU ETS and fossil fuel markets (natural gas, crude oil, and coal). By combining DCC-GARCH and TVP-SV-VAR models, the analysis uses daily data from 2018 to 2023 to capture time-varying dependencies and structural shocks. The findings show that the carbon market maintains its strongest dynamic correlation with the natural gas market. Notably, while the pandemic led to a simultaneous decline in energy and carbon prices, the Russia-Ukraine conflict caused energy supply disruptions and industrial production cuts, resulting in the divergence of carbon and energy prices. Time-varying impulse response analysis further indicates that carbon and energy prices fluctuate in the same direction during demand shocks but move in opposite directions under supply shocks. Furthermore, the EU’s energy structural dependence amplifies the impact of natural gas supply shocks, while the Market Stability Reserve (MSR) effectively suppresses carbon price fluctuations through quota adjustment. This study distinguishes for the first time the differentiated transmission pathways of supply and demand shocks to the carbon-energy linkage. It provides a theoretical basis for the EU to design shock response policies, proposing to optimize the MSR mechanism to buffer demand shocks, hedge supply risks with energy diversification, and prioritize the stability of the natural gas supply chain to balance climate goals and energy security.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cb645fe6a8c024954b8aa0https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-026-07431-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A non-parametric analysis of the driving factors of China's carbon prices2021 · 62 citations
  2. 2Crude oil market and stock markets during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from the US, Japan, and Germany2021 · 360 citations
  3. 3Dynamic Conditional Correlation2002 · 7,219 citations
  4. 4Coupling and coordinated development of low-carbon economy and green finance: an empirical study of the Yangtze River Delta region in China2023 · 13 citations
  5. 5Extreme risk spillover from uncertainty to carbon markets in China and the EU—A time varying copula approach2022 · 64 citations