PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 31, 2026European Heart Journal7 citations

Volume vs intensity of physical activity and risk of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular chronic diseases

View Full Paper
JWJiehua WeiMSMinxue ShenSLShenxin Li

Key Result

Participants with >4% vigorous physical activity had 29%–61% lower risks of eight major chronic diseases and all-cause mortality compared with those with 0% VPA (P<0.001).

Key Points

  • This study aims to clarify the relationship between vigorous physical activity (VPA) and the incidence of various chronic diseases.
  • Prospective population-based cohort study with 96,408 device-measured participants and 375,730 self-reported participants from the UK Biobank.
  • Main outcomes included the incidence of eight chronic diseases and all-cause mortality, analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models.
  • Participants' activity intensity and volume were assessed using device data (accelerometers) and self-reported data (IPAQ).
  • Participants with >4% VPA had 29%-61% lower risks of chronic disease outcomes compared to those with 0% VPA.
  • Strong intensity-dependence was observed for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases with 20.3% attributable to intensity vs 1% to volume.
  • A higher %VPA was inversely associated with risk for eight major chronic diseases and all-cause mortality, supporting prioritization of higher-intensity activities.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=472,138)

Structured PICO

Does a higher proportion of vigorous physical activity reduce the incidence of multiple chronic diseases and all-cause mortality in adults?

P
Population
96,408 participants (mean age 61.9 years, women: 56.3%) with device-measured data and 375,730 participants (mean age 56.2 years, women: 52.2%) with self-reported physical activity data from the UK Biobank.
I
Intervention
Higher proportion of vigorous physical activity (%VPA) relative to total volume of physical activity
C
Comparator
Lower proportion of vigorous physical activity (e.g., 0% VPA)
O
Outcome
Incidence of eight chronic diseases: major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), atrial fibrillation (AFib), type 2 diabetes (T2D), immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), chronic respiratory diseases (CRD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and dementia, as well as all-cause mortalityhard clinical

A higher proportion of vigorous physical activity, independent of total activity volume, is inversely associated with the incidence of major chronic diseases and all-cause mortality, suggesting intensity has a higher preventive potential than volume.

Main Result

Effect estimate: 29%-61% lower risk

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims While vigorous physical activity (VPA) is known to provide greater health benefits per unit time than moderate activity, the spectrum of these benefits across different chronic diseases and the relative importance of physical activity (PA) intensity vs volume remain unclear. This study examined associations between the proportion of VPA (%VPA) relative to total volume of PA and the incidence of multiple chronic disease outcomes. Methods This prospective population-based cohort study included 96,408 participants (mean age 61.9 years, women: 56.3%) with device-measured data (wrist-worn accelerometers) and 375,730 participants (mean age 56.2 years, women: 52.2%) with self-reported PA data (IPAQ) from the UK Biobank. Main outcomes included incidence of eight chronic diseases: major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), atrial fibrillation (AFib), type 2 diabetes (T2D), immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), chronic respiratory diseases (CRD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and dementia, as well as all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence interval. Results In the device-measured data, non-linear inverse dose–response relationships were observed between %VPA and all outcomes (all P .001), and these patterns remained consistent across strata of total PA volume. In multivariable models adjusted for total PA volume, participants with 4% VPA had 29%–61% lower risks of these outcomes compared with those with 0% VPA. Joint analyses and population attributable fraction revealed distinct disease-specific patterns: immune-mediated inflammatory diseases showed very strong intensity-dependence with minimal contribution from PA volume (20.3% for intensity vs 1.0% for volume), while MACE (17.8% vs 6.0%), AFib (16.2% vs 5.0%), CRD (21.4% vs 5.6%), and dementia (32.3% vs 8.1%) demonstrated intensity predominance with modest contribution from PA volume, and T2D (26.6% vs 17.7%), MASLD (22.1% vs 16.6%), CKD (23.0% vs 15.3%), and all-cause mortality (31.4% vs 14.2%) showed more balanced contributions from both intensity and volume. Conclusions A higher %VPA, independent of total activity volume, is inversely associated with eight major chronic diseases and all-cause mortality. Intensity consistently demonstrated a higher preventive potential than total PA volume. These findings support, whenever possible, prioritizing higher-intensity activities in clinical and public health interventions aimed at preventing non-communicable diseases.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wei et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in General population (n=472,138). Vigorous physical activity (%VPA) vs. 0% VPA was evaluated on Incidence of eight chronic diseases and all-cause mortality (29%-61% lower risk, p=<0.001). Participants with >4% vigorous physical activity had 29%–61% lower risks of eight major chronic diseases and all-cause mortality compared with those with 0% VPA (P<0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cb64f0e6a8c024954b90c8https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehag168
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper