PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 31, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Gauge-Compatible Structures from ℓ¹ Defect Flows

View Full Paper
JCJEREMY H. CARROLL

Key Points

  • The research aims to establish a framework for selecting gauge symmetry from ℓ¹ defect flows in discrete structures.
  • Developed a constraint-based framework based on ℓ¹ defect geometry.
  • Imposed a principle of monotone reduction of local inconsistency.
  • Classified admissible symmetry groups acting on state spaces.
  • Identified minimal cyclic closure and constructed a unique metric.
  • Distinguished between robust group structures and measure-dependent quantities.
  • Identified SU(3), SU(2), and U(1) as unique symmetry structures.
  • Demonstrated that the gauge group SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1) arises from structural principles rather than symmetry breaking.
  • Clarified differences between topological robustness of group structures and transport amplitudes.

Abstract

This paper presents a constraint-based framework for the selection of gauge symmetry arising from ℓ¹ defect geometry on discrete structures. Starting from a minimal inconsistency functional, we impose a single structural principle: defect resolution must proceed via monotone reduction of local inconsistency. This induces a minimal cyclic closure (N = 3), whose transport operator forces complex phase structure and uniquely selects a unitary invariant metric. Within this framework, admissible symmetry groups acting irreducibly on the resulting state spaces are classified. The construction yields SU(3), SU(2), and U(1) as the unique symmetry structures compatible with minimal consistency, cyclic transport, and irreducibility constraints. The resulting gauge group SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1) emerges as a structural consequence of the framework, rather than from symmetry breaking of a larger unified group. The paper explicitly distinguishes between topologically robust results (group structure, generation count) and measure-dependent quantities (e.g., transport amplitudes), and does not assume a priori quantum mechanical structure. This work is part of a broader program investigating ℓ¹-based obstruction theory and its implications for physical and computational systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

JEREMY H. CARROLL (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cb6541e6a8c024954b9685https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19322969
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper