PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1996Psychological Methods9,952 citations

Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.

View Full Paper
RMRobert C. MacCallumMBMichael W. BrowneHSHazuki M. Sugawara

Key Points

  • This research aims to create a framework for testing hypotheses and calculating sample sizes for covariance structure models.
  • Developed a framework for hypothesis testing and power analysis in covariance structure modeling.
  • Defined effect size using the root-mean-square error of approximation fit index.
  • Provided computer programs for conducting power analyses and determining sample sizes.
  • Established a method to test null hypotheses of model fit, reversing conventional roles.
  • Demonstrated the ability to directly estimate power based on specified parameters.
  • Outlined the process to determine minimum sample size needed to achieve targeted power levels.

Abstract

A framework for hypothesis testing and power analysis in the assessment of fit of covariance structure models is presented. We emphasize the value of confidence intervals for fit indices, and we stress the relationship of confidence intervals to a framework for hypothesis testing. The approach allows for testing null hypotheses of not-good fit, reversing the role of the null hypothesis in conventional tests of model fit, so that a significant result provides strong support for good fit. The approach also allows for direct estimation of power, where effect size is defined in terms of a null and alternative value of the root-mean-square error of approximation fit index proposed by J. H. Steiger and J. M. Lind (1980). It is also feasible to determine minimum sample size required to achieve a given level of power for any test of fit in this framework. Computer programs and examples are provided for power analyses and calculation of minimum sample sizes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

MacCallum et al. (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cbc42b7d52db8d17d84300https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.130
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluating and Modifying Covariance Structure Models: A Review and Recommendation1990 · 249 citations
  2. 2Powering the Circumplex: A Practical Guide to Sample Size for the Structural Summary Method2026
  3. 3Power analyses for measurement model misspecification and response shift detection with structural equation modeling2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Towards a power analysis for PLS-based methods2024 · 3 citations
  5. 5Sample size determination for hypothesis testing on the intraclass correlation coefficient in a two‐way analysis of variance model2025