PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Journal of Personalized Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Tocilizumab and Rituximab in Systemic Sclerosis: A Real-Life Retrospective Observational Study Across Different Clinical Phenotypes

View Full Paper
SCSilvia CavalliMPM. R. PellicoGTGiorgia Trignani

Key Points

  • The research aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab and rituximab in patients with systemic sclerosis across different clinical phenotypes.
  • Conducted a retrospective observation of SSc patients treated with TCZ or RTX over 12–24 months.
  • Assessed clinical measures like modified Rodnan Skin Score, C-reactive protein, and revised EUSTAR activity index at multiple time points.
  • Applied statistical methods for repeated measures to analyze outcomes over time.
  • Both TCZ and RTX groups showed significant reductions in mRSS, CRP levels, and RAI over time.
  • RTX-treated patients had a greater improvement in absolute mRSS scores compared to TCZ patients.
  • No treatment-related discontinuations occurred; however, one death and one inefficacy case were reported in the TCZ group.

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) and rituximab (RTX) in real-world patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), across different clinical phenotypes and lines of therapy, evaluating both global clinical outcomes and lung function. Methods: SSc patients treated with TCZ (n = 27) or RTX (n = 23) were retrospectively followed for 12–24 months. Clinical measures, including modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS), C-reactive protein (CRP), and revised EUSTAR activity index 2017 (RAI), as well as spirometric parameters, were recorded at baseline and 6, 12, and 24 months. Statistical methods for repeated measures were applied to investigate outcome trends. Given the baseline differences, between-group comparisons were considered exploratory. Results: RTX was used earlier in disease course, while TCZ was mainly used as a rescue therapy. In both groups, mRSS, CRP levels and RAI significantly decreased over time. RTX-treated patients showed a greater absolute mRSS improvement, in line with higher baseline skin scores. No treatment discontinuations due to adverse events occurred in either group; one death and one discontinuation due to inefficacy were observed in the TCZ group. Among SSc-ILD patients, FVC% showed a modest decline in both groups, while DLCO% remained overall stable, and only a few patients met the OMERACT criteria for functional progression. Conclusions: In this real-world, single-center cohort of SSc patients, both agents were associated with a positive impact on disease activity, with a low rate of lung progression and with favorable safety profiles. Owing to substantial baseline imbalances and confounding by indication, between-group comparisons do not allow firm conclusions on comparative effectiveness. Overall, these data support the use of both agents in different clinical scenarios.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cavalli et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ccb6ce16edfba7beb8893ahttps://doi.org/10.3390/jpm16040186
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Safety and effectiveness of tocilizumab in systemic sclerosis: a multicentre French-Italian study2026
  2. 2Efficacy and safety of rituximab versus intravenous cyclophosphamide for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: a retrospective cohort study2025 · 1 citations
  3. 3OP0265 RITUXIMAB RETENTION RATE IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS: A REAL-LIFE ITALIAN MULTICENTER STUDY2024
  4. 4Multi-target Therapy with Rituximab plus Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Rituximab Monotherapy in Systemic Sclerosis–Associated Interstitial Lung Disease2026
  5. 5AB1207 RITUXIMAB IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS NON-RESPONSIVE TO CsDMARDs – PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE, OBSERVATIONAL, MONOCENTRIC STUDY2024 · 1 citations