PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Veterinary Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Comparative On-Farm Welfare Assessment of Sheep in Extensive, Semi-Extensive, and Semi-Intensive Systems

View Full Paper
SPSnežana PaskašIPIvan PihlerMPMarija Pajić

Key Points

  • The study aimed to assess the effects of different sheep production systems on animal welfare outcomes.
  • Evaluation conducted on 30 sheep farms in Serbia using the AWIN Welfare Protocol.
  • Welfare indicators categorized into resource-based, management-based, and animal-based metrics.
  • Comparison of welfare indicators across extensive, semi-extensive, and semi-intensive production systems.
  • No significant difference in space allowance across production systems.
  • Management practices showed significant variations, affecting sheep welfare.
  • Common welfare issues included low prevalence of respiratory problems and social withdrawal.
  • Extensive farms reported the use of painful mutilations, while semi-extensive and semi-intensive farms had higher tail docking rates.

Abstract

Sheep welfare outcomes vary depending on production systems, breeds, and environmental conditions. This study examined the effects of extensive, semi-extensive, and semi-intensive sheep production systems on animal welfare in Serbia, using the AWIN Welfare Protocol to evaluate 30 farms. Welfare indicators were categorised into resource-based, management-based, and animal-based metrics. The results indicated that there was no significant difference in space allowance among the production systems (p > 0.05). This suggests that the space provided was adequate for semi-intensive farms and suitable for both semi-extensive and extensive farms. However, management practices showed significant variations (p < 0.05), indicating diverse impacts on sheep welfare. No ocular discharge or stereotypic behaviours were observed, while respiratory issues, social withdrawal, and excessive itching were found to have a very low prevalence across all farms. The primary welfare concern identified in the extensive farms was the use of painful mutilations. Semi-extensive and semi-intensive farms had significantly higher rates of tail docking (p < 0.05) and poorer fleece cleanliness. These findings highlight the necessity of addressing the root causes of poor welfare to improve sheep welfare standards. Therefore, achieving sustainable welfare outcomes requires an integrated approach that combines genetic suitability, adequate housing, and effective management practices.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Paskaš et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ccb6fd16edfba7beb88bc8https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13040329
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Effect of Environment and Husbandry Practices on Sheep Welfare2025
  2. 2Comparative Evaluations of Abnormal Behaviour, Panting, Lamb Mortality and Fleece Cleanliness in Kenguri Sheep under Intensive and Extensive Rearing Systems, Yadgir District, India2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Evaluation of the Welfare of Şavak Akkaraman Sheep Raised in Extensive Farming Systems Using AWIN Protocol2026
  4. 4Sheep Welfare in Confined and Pasture Production Systems: A Comparative Study with Emphasis on Parasitological Status2026
  5. 5Horse welfare in semi-extensive system: establishing a welfare protocol and comparing pasture and stable farming systems2024 · 3 citations