PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026IET Generation Transmission & Distribution0 citationsOpen Access

Post‐Storm Grid Recovery and Resilience Enhancement in Integrated Power‐Gas Network Incorporating Spatio‐Temporal Storm Modelling, Mobile Battery Deployment and Demand Response Programme

View Full Paper
SMSajad MahdaviHAHamdi AbdiSKShahram Karimi

Key Points

  • To quantify the benefits of mobile battery deployment and demand response in enhancing grid resilience after storms.
  • Used Monte Carlo simulation to model impacts of windstorms on power lines.
  • Evaluated three resilience strategies: integration of gas networks with power grids, optimisation of battery deployment, and demand response programme.
  • Optimisation posed as mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) on an IEEE 33-bus network.
  • Mobile battery energy storage and demand response reduce operating costs significantly.
  • Increased performance level noted as a resilience metric during severe storm conditions.
  • Enhanced load recovery demonstrated through the integration of energy hubs with power grids.

Abstract

ABSTRACT As natural disasters intensify, timely dispatch of mobile battery energy storage (MBES), coordinated electricity gas operation and participatory demand response can substantially reduce outage and extent. Quantifying these benefits requires an integrated spatio‐temporal model that embeds hazard dynamics, dynamic transit times (DTTs), dynamic transit price (DTP), probabilistic repair time (PRT) and operational uncertainties in dispatch and resource allocation. This study addresses that gap using Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) to model the spatio‐temporal impact of windstorms on power lines and supporting more realistic planning for faster recovery. Repair is modelled probabilistically. The windstorm crosses one area and enters another at a different speed. Three resilience strategies are evaluated: integration of gas networks and energy hubs (EHs) with power grids; spatio‐temporal optimisation of MBES deployment accounting for transit‐time and cost variability due to traffic to accelerate load recovery; and an incentive‐based demand response programme (DRP) for shiftable loads. The optimisation is posed as a MILP on an IEEE 33‐bus network. Simulations cover four cases, with the most comprehensive combining all strategies. Results show that MBES, DRP and EHs act synergistically to reduce operating costs, decrease energy not supplied, and enhance the performance level as a resilience metric during disasters under severe conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mahdavi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ccb71716edfba7beb88dd8https://doi.org/10.1049/gtd2.70256
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper