PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026PeerJ1 citationsOpen Access

Interpretable machine learning model using CT body composition combined with inflammatory and nutritional indicators to predict pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: a retrospective study

LZLinhua ZhongUK CoalQZQiao ZengJiangxi Provincial Cancer HospitalFZFei ZouJiangxi Provincial Cancer Hospital

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a machine learning model that predicts pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer using body composition and inflammatory markers.
  • Retrospective study with 189 breast cancer patients divided into training (142) and testing (47) sets.
  • Analyzed CT-based body composition and routine blood test variables.
  • Identified independent predictors using LASSO and multivariate logistic regression.
  • Compared eight machine learning algorithms, selecting the optimal model based on AUC and calibration.
  • Utilized SHAP analysis for visualizing predictive contributions.
  • Identified six independent predictors: visceral adipose tissue density, skeletal muscle density, intramuscular adipose tissue content, albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio, systemic inflammation response index, and molecular subtype.
  • XGBoost model showed best performance with AUC of 0.888 in internal validation and 0.831 in the test set.
  • Model calibration was good with a Brier score of 0.180.

Abstract

Objective Accurate prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is critical for optimizing treatment in breast cancer. This study develops and validates an interpretable, cost-effective machine learning (ML) model integrating computed tomography (CT)-based body composition parameters with routine inflammatory and nutritional biomarkers to predict pCR. Methods In this retrospective single-center study ( n = 189; January 2019–June 2023), patients were divided into training ( n = 142) and independent temporal test ( n = 47) sets. CT-based body composition parameters and blood test variables were analyzed. Independent predictors were identified via Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator and multivariate logistic regression. Eight ML algorithms were compared, and the optimal model was selected based on Area Under the Curve (AUC), calibration, and clinical utility. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis visualized predictive contributions. Results Six independent predictors were identified: visceral adipose tissue density, skeletal muscle density, intramuscular adipose tissue content, albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio, systemic inflammation response index, and molecular subtype. The eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.888 (95% CI 0.837–0.939) in internal validation and 0.831 (95% CI 0.723–0.938) in the independent test set. The model exhibited good calibration (Brier score = 0.180). SHAP analysis highlighted the contribution of host-related factors alongside tumor biology. Conclusions This interpretable ML model effectively integrates host-related body composition and inflammatory-nutritional markers to predict pCR. By utilizing routinely available data, this approach offers a practical, accessible tool for initial risk stratification, complementing existing imaging-based strategies and supporting personalized clinical decision-making.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ccb7c216edfba7beb89dbdhttps://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.21051
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper