PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging0 citationsOpen Access

Comparative Analysis of Multiple Combined Structure Transmit Arrays for 10.5 Tesla Human Brain Imaging

View Full Paper
YPYoung D. ParkJKJun Moo KwakMWMyung Kyun Woo

Key Points

  • To enhance B1 + efficiency and spatial coverage for 10.5 Tesla human brain imaging using various antenna configurations.
  • Conducted finite-difference time-domain simulations using a detailed human head model.
  • Assessed circularly polarized B1 + fields from multiple antenna arrays including 8-channel loop and hybrid designs.
  • Extended designs to 16-channel arrays and interleaved configurations for improved coverage.
  • The 8-channel MDH array had the highest central B1 + efficiency, improving by 38.5% over loop arrays and 33.3% over dipole arrays.
  • 16-channel loop + dipole and loop + MDH arrays improved efficiency by up to 28.9% compared to 8-channel models.
  • Interleaved arrays provided better peripheral excitation and coverage, with the T-shaped monopole + MDH configuration achieving high central efficiency.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate several hybrid multi-element configurations to enhance B1 + efficiency, defined as the transmit magnetic field generated by the radiofrequency (RF) coil normalized by the net input power, and spatial coverage for 10.5 tesla (T) human brain imaging.Materials and Methods: Finite-difference time-domain simulations were performed using an anatomically detailed human head model to assess circularly polarized B1 + fields generated by 8-channel loop, dipole antenna, and monopole and dipole hybrid antenna (MDH) arrays.These baseline designs were extended to 16-channel arrays combining loops with dipole antennas or MDHs and to interleaved MDH-based arrays incorporating axially displaced dipole or monopole antennas.Results: The 8-channel MDH array yielded the highest central B1 + efficiency, exceeding loop and dipole antenna arrays by 38.5% and 33.3%, respectively, but peripheral coverage remained limited.The 16-channel loop + dipole antenna and loop + MDH arrays improved overall B1 + efficiency by up to 28.9% relative to their 8-channel counterparts.Interleaved combined structure arrays further enhanced peripheral excitation and superior-inferior coverage, with the T-shaped monopole antenna + MDH configuration achieving a high central efficiency.Conclusion: MDH-centered combined structure arrays effectively balance deep-field efficiency and peripheral coverage at 10.5 T. Interleaving monopole antenna-type elements beneath MDHs provides additional improvement and represents a promising design pathway for achieving more uniform excitation in 10.5 T brain imaging.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Park et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cd7a095652765b073a6de5https://doi.org/10.13104/imri.2025.0060
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper